Investigating Operational Readiness of Health Systems for Paediatric Mass Casualty Incidents: A Scoping Review Protocol
Hickson, J.; Thompson, W.; McNamara, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to understand the frameworks and methodologies used in assessing the operational readiness (OPR) of health systems for mass casualty incidents (MCI) involving children. IntroductionChildren are at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality because of mass casualty incidents. A lack of operational readiness for mass casualty incidents reduces the capacity of the health system to adequately respond swiftly and safely. Understanding the methods by which health system OPR can be assessed in relation to MCIs is key to the development of recommendations for improving OPR. Inclusion criteriaThis review will include published evidence (including grey literature) which investigates methods of assessing health system OPR for mass casualty incidents. Studies published in the English language will be included and there will be no time limit applied to the search. MethodsThe search databases will consist of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, PsycInfo and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews will be used to allow for clarity, replicability and transparency and the review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. Screening will be performed using Endnote 20 and Covidence software programs. Study characteristics, methodologies, assessment tools and outcomes will be extracted for analysis. A descriptive analysis, thematic synthesis, evidence mapping and a narrative synthesis will be undertaken to provide a summary of the review findings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 93%
- Health System Resilience-enhancing Strategies for Managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concerns (PHEIC): Success and Challenges A Systematic Review Protocol 92%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol For The Development Of A Core Outcome Set For Respectful Maternal And Newborn Care In A Low-Middle Income Setting 93%
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 92%
- How effective are UK-based support interventions and services targeted at adults who have experienced domestic and sexual violence and abuse at improving their safety and wellbeing? A systematic review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact on all-cause mortality of a case prediction and prevention intervention designed to reduce secondary care utilisation: findings from a randomised controlled trial 89%
- The Balancing Act of Academic Clinical Fellows in UK Emergency Medicine: A Qualitative Study 88%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- A protocol for a systematic critical realist synthesis of school mindfulness interventions designed to promote pupils’ mental wellbeing 92%
- SDG5 ‘Gender Equality’ and the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries 92%
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Humanitarian-Development Nexus and Sexual and Reproductive Health Interventions in Fragile Settings: A Scoping Review 93%
- Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Nurturing Care in Nairobi Slums: Findings from 5 rounds of cross-sectional telephone surveys 92%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.