Beyond Accuracy: Multidimensional Evaluation of Large Language Models in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Management Emphasizing Prompting
Luo, J.; Ma, J.; Wang, T.; Qiu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, H.; Chen, G.; Wang, W.
Show abstract
Background & AimsHepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of primary liver cancer and remains a major global health challenge. In resource-limited settings, patients often face barriers such as low screening rates, poor adherence, and limited access to medical information. Despite comprehensive clinical guidelines, issues like inadequate patient education and ineffective communication persist. While large language models show promise in clinical communication and decision support, their performance in hepatocellular carcinoma management has not been systematically evaluated across multiple dimensions. MethodsTen emerging language models, including general-purpose and medical-domain models, were assessed under prompted and unprompted conditions using a standardized question set covering five key stages: general knowledge, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Accuracy was rated by experts, while semantic consistency, local interpretability, information entropy, and readability were measured computationally. ResultsChatGPT-4o and Grok-3 achieved the highest accuracy (2.62 {+/-} 0.06, 93%; 2.60 {+/-} 0.06, 95%) and interpretability (0.43;0.43). Prompting significantly improved accuracy (p < 0.001) and interpretability (p < 0.001) across all models. Semantic consistency declined slightly in most models; information entropy generally increased; readability changes varied. ConclusionsThis study presents the first multidimensional evaluation of large language models in hepatocellular carcinoma-related clinical tasks. General-purpose models outperformed some medical models, revealing limitations in domain-specific fine-tuning. Prompt design strongly influenced model performance. Further research should integrate diverse prompt strategies and clinical scenarios to improve the usability of language models in real-world oncology settings. Lay summaryThis study evaluated how well-advanced language-based artificial intelligence models can answer clinical questions related to hepatocellular carcinoma. The results showed that some models, especially when guided with structured instructions, provided accurate and understandable responses. These findings suggest that such tools may help improve communication and access to information for both doctors and patients managing liver cancer.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of natural language processing in cancer care: a systematic scoping review with narrative synthesis 94%
- Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline 93%
- Enriching Representation Learning Using 53 Million Patient Notes through Human Phenotype Ontology Embedding 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 93%
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 93%
- From Tool to Teammate: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinician-AI Collaborative Workflows for Diagnosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.