International Delphi Consensus on Risk Factors Justifying Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
Stangl, F. P.; Kranz, J.; Wagenlehner, F.; Bjerklund Johansen, T. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundTransperineal prostate biopsy (TP-Bx) is increasingly favored over the transrectal approach due to its lower rate of infectious complications. Emerging evidence suggests that TP-Bx can often be safely performed without antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk patients. However, there is no international consensus on the clinical risk factors that justify prophylactic antibiotic use, leading to wide practice variability and concerns regarding antimicrobial stewardship. ObjectiveThis Delphi consensus study aims to identify and define procedural, patient-related, and microbiological risk factors that warrant antibiotic prophylaxis in TP-Bx and to establish evidence-informed best practice recommendations. MethodsA modified three-round Delphi process will be conducted in accordance with ACCORD and CREDES guidelines. A diverse panel of 50-60 international experts in urology, infectious diseases, microbiology, and antimicrobial stewardship will anonymously evaluate predefined and newly suggested risk factors using a 6-point Likert scale. Consensus will be defined as [≥]70% of participants rating an item as highly important (score 5-6) and <15% rating it as unimportant (score 1-2). Items failing to reach consensus in Rounds 1 and 2 will be re-evaluated in subsequent rounds. OutcomesThe primary outcome will be a consensus-based list of risk factors justifying antibiotic prophylaxis in TP-Bx. Secondary outcomes include recommendations for diagnostic testing, prophylactic regimens, and thresholds for initiating routine prophylaxis based on institutional infection rates. DisseminationFindings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals to support global efforts in harmonizing practice and promoting responsible antibiotic use in prostate cancer diagnostics.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Retrospective Validation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Diagnostic Assessment of Prostate Biopsies on the ProMort Cohort: Study Protocol 93%
- Prescribing patterns for medical treatment of suspected prostatic obstruction: A spatiotemporal statistical analysis of Scottish open access data 93%
- Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intraoperative calculus or hemorrhage in transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy as a risk factor for recurrent hemospermia 92%
- Real-world evidence: telemedicine for complicated cases of urinary tract infection 92%
- Glycoprofiling of proteins as prostate cancer biomarkers: a multinational population study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing plasma galectin-3 concentrations in catheter-bearing hospitalized patients 88%
- Urinalysis, but not blood biochemistry, detects the early renal-impairment in patients with COVID-19 87%
- A new method for improving extraction efficiency and purity of urine and plasma cell-free DNA 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- A population-level analysis of the protective effects of androgen deprivation therapy against COVID-19 disease incidence and severity 89%
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis 88%
- Clinical features, Diagnosis, and Treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review of case reports and case series 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 89%
- Aerodigestoscopy (ADS): A retrospective examination of the feasibility, safety, and comfort of a new procedure for the evaluation of physiological disorders of the aerodigestive tract 88%
- Procalcitonin to Predict Severity of Acute Cholangitis and Need for Urgent Biliary Decompression: Systematic Scoping Review 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.