Perceived Barriers and Enablers to Shared Decision-Making in Assessment and Management of Risk: A Qualitative Interview Study with Mental Health Professionals
Ahmed, N.; Begum, F.; Barlow, S.; Reynolds, L.; Drey, N.; Mulligan, K.; Simpson, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundInvolving service users in decisions about their care is essential to delivering recovery-orientated mental health services. Research shows, however, that service users often are not involved in the assessment and management of the risk component of their care. This paper explores mental health professionals perceptions of the barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and management. MethodsWe conducted semilJstructured interviews with fifteen mental health professionals working within either a community mental health or an early intervention service in the United Kingdom. Data collection and analysis were guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework for behaviour change, which encompasses fourteen domains identified as influencing behaviour. ResultsThe findings show that staff are motivated to work collaboratively but experience a complex range of barriers that hinder the implementation of shared decision-making, including challenges related to the individuals mental capacity and level of engagement, managing disagreements, type and level of risk, quality of therapeutic relationships, fear of causing distress or disengagement, and environmental constraints such as time, resources and place of meeting. Enabling factors included a supportive multi-disciplinary team, training they received as part of education and practice, clinical experience providing them with skills, and a belief that equipping individuals with knowledge and understanding of their risk and safety could help them to manage it more effectively. ConclusionThe findings of this study may inform future intervention design to enhance collaboration in the assessment and management of risk and support current clinical practice in this area.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 97%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 98%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 97%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 98%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 97%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 95%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 95%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 97%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 96%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.