Back

Cumulative TB disease burden following sputum Xpert Ultra 'Trace' results in clinical settings: Results from a multi-site observational clinical study

Dalmat, R.; Visek, C.; Budiawan, E.; Stein, G.; Nalutaaya, A.; Mukiibi, J.; Nantale, M.; Biche, P.; Sung, J.; Magcaba, Z.; Ngcobo, N.; Morton, J. F.; Lenn, M.; Aucock, S.; Steadman, A.; Shapiro, A. E.; Draper, R.; Ganguloo, A.; Wilson, D.; Katamba, A.; Kendall, E. A.; Drain, P. K.

2025-07-15 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.07.14.25331384 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHighly sensitive molecular tests, like Xpert Ultra, are reshaping TB diagnosis--detecting paucibacillary TB but sometimes creating uncertainty when they detect DNA in extremely low quantities that may not signal disease. This ambiguity also complicates the evaluation of novel diagnostic strategies. We sought to monitor adults with a Trace result on an Xpert Ultra test to estimate the risk of tuberculosis disease up to 24 months later. MethodsWe conducted a multi-site clinical observational study in South Africa and Uganda, where we enrolled ambulatory participants aged >=15 years with a sputum Xpert Ultra Trace result who had not yet initiated TB treatment. All participants underwent comprehensive clinical evaluation and repeated, standard sputum TB testing. Clinicians deferred treatment recommendations if TB status remained uncertain after evaluation. Untreated participants were followed regularly until TB diagnosis and/or treatment initiation. We estimated cumulative incidence of TB disease, defined by three reference standards. ResultsOf 311 participants with Trace results (50% male, 57% PLHIV, 37% treated for TB within the last 5 years), 24% were positive for TB within 12 months by culture, 37% by sputum Xpert or culture, and 54% by culture or clinical diagnosis. After excluding those diagnosed with TB at baseline, patients identified at baseline as having recent TB history, abnormal chest x-ray, or positive tongue swab, had higher risk of TB diagnosis (hazard ratios: 2.6, 2.4, 4.5, respectively) during follow-up. This hazard was highest in the first three months after the negative baseline evaluation (0.22 [95% CI: 0.19-0.26] per person-month) and decreased to 0.01 [95% CI: 0-0.02] per person-month in both the 3-6 and 6-12-month intervals. ConclusionApproximately half of adults and adolescents with a sputum Trace result were diagnosed with TB disease within twelve months. Although most TB diagnoses were made within 3 months, risk remained higher than estimated population incidence rates through the follow-up period. Individuals with sputum Trace results should receive close clinical monitoring, despite initial clinical treatment decision. Summary resultsXpert Ultra "Trace" results detect low quantities of TB DNA, creating diagnostic uncertainty that complicates both clinical decisions and diagnostics evaluation. This clinical observational cohort study followed untreated patients with Trace results for twelve or more months, using survival analysis to estimate actual tuberculosis disease risk and identify risk factors.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.3%
2
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
7
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
8
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
9
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
25
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%