DECODE the quality of dying in the intensive care unit
Dougan, S.; Duke, G. J.; Hunter, S.; Ha, S. N.; Johnson, N. J.; Lehane, D.; Saw, J. T.; Teo, A.; Zou, S.; Barrett, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveExisting national quality of care processes do not assess quality of care for the dying patient. We developed the Documentation and Evaluation of Care of Dying Equation (DECoDE) score, a 21-point unweighted binary questionnaire. for this purpose. DesignRetrospective clinical audit by clinical staff of medical records. SettingTwo metropolitan adult intensive care units (ICU) in Victoria. Participants157 randomly selected records of adults who died in ICU between 1 Jan 2015 - 30 June 2017. Main outcomesDECoDE audit score, patient characteristics, and therapeutics delivered in the last 24hrs of life. ResultsOver 30-months there were 5,194 ICU admissions and 539 (10.4%) deaths - 157 (43.9%) were randomly selected for audit. 122 (82.2%) were receiving curative treatment within the 24-hours prior to death. 130 (83%) deaths were expected and occurred 1.5 (IQR =1-4) days after agreement to withdraw treatment. Median DE-CoDE score was 11 (IQR =9-13) out of a maximum score of 21. Factors associated with a lower DECoDE score included shorter length of stay, unexpected death, and non-oncologic diagnosis. Other patient factors including age, severity of illness (APACHE-IIIJ) score =102 [IQR =80-128]), and organ donation (7%) were not significant. ConclusionThe DECoDE audit tool may be useful for screening of care provided to dying patients in ICU. Not all patients require a high score for high quality care but a low score may indicate poor quality of care, warranting further review.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 95%
- Towards definitions of critical illness and critical care using concept analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 94%
- Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study 94%
- End-of-life care in hematological malignancies – a nationwide comparative study on the Swedish Register of Palliative Care 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 94%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 92%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services 92%
- Response and role of palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national telephone survey of hospices in Italy 91%
- Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end-of-life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: a mixed methods observational study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Organizational models and patient-reported outcomes for palliative care across five tertiary hospitals in Nigeria: an Environmental Scan 92%
- Improving the quality of in-patient neonatal routine data as a pre-requisite for monitoring and improving quality of care at scale: A multi-site retrospective cohort study in Kenyan hospitals 92%
- A Clinical Audit on Longer-Term Stroke Management as A Specific Service in A Primary Care Setting: Assessing Adherence of Service and Clinical Parameters 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.