Back

Gait analysis of Pak Biawak: a necrobot lizard built using the skeleton of an Asian water monitor (Varanus salvator )

Foulds, L.; Yudha, D. S.; Alam, P.

2025-07-17 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.07.12.664518 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this paper,we consider the feasibility of mimicking the sprawling gait of a live varanid (Varanus salvator) using a necrobot (named: Pak Biawak), a robot constructed using the skeletal parts of a deceased varanid of the same species. Pak Biawak is manufactured using simple joints and components, and limb motion is coupled to passive spine bending to enable the sprawling gait. Here, we assess both the lateral and dorsal kinematics of Pak Biawak at different speeds, and compare the metrics from each to those of a similarly sized live varanid. When assessing lateral view shape metrics (stride aspect ratio, stride circularity, normalised stride swept area, normalised stride swept area perimeter), we find that Pak Biawaks gait is consistent across all speeds and the majority of Pak Biawaks lateral shape metrics are kinematically aligned with those of the live varanid. This also proves true when comparing Pak Biawaks lateral trajectory metrics (radial distance of swept area, normallised root mean squared error) against those of the live varanid, and at different speeds of sprawling. Pak Biawaks dorsal metrics include the spine bending amplitude and period, and these are not found to be significantly different to those of the live varanid, however, Pak Biawaks amplitude is affected by sprawling speed. We use three metrics to compare forward and reverse limb sweeps including, angular curvature, differential curvature, and a normalised arc length. Of these, a preponderance of highly significant differences (p[≤] 0.001) are observed on comparing the forward sweep arc length of Pak Biawak at every sprawling speed against the forward sweep arc length of the live lizard. All other kinematic metrics in the necrobot are nevertheless very close to those of the live lizard. Finally, when comparing the trackway width of Pak Biawak against the live lizard, we again find there is very close kinematic compatibility between the two, and conclude that our necrobot can be designed and manufactured to mimic the sprawling gait of a real varanid, even when using simple kinematic linkages in unison with a passive spine bending differential applied at only one central location in the necrobot spine.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
11
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
12
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%