The risks and benefits associated with the self-selection of pharmacy medicines (PMEDs): A rapid systematic review
Ross, L. S.; Guirguis, A.; Tang, W.; Wilson, L.; Jones, E.; Davies, J. E.; Ashiru-Oredope, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundPharmacies in the UK are increasingly implementing a self-selection model for Pharmacy medicines (PMEDs) in physical pharmacies and allowing their purchase from online pharmacies. This model potentially weakens the additional level of protection recommended by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) by removing the opportunity for intervention, possibly risking patient harm. ObjectiveTo assess the risks and benefits associated with a PMEDs self-selection model in pharmacy settings. MethodsA systematic search was conducted across three databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library) from 01/10/2024 to 22/10/2024. The search terms comprised Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free text with wildcard truncations. Only studies published from 01/2014 - 10/2024 and published in English were eligible for inclusion. Studies identified (were exported to Excel, where duplicates were removed . The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of all included studies. ResultsA total of 55 studies of the 104 initially screened were included in the review. The country most frequently reported on was Australia (10/55; 18%), followed by multi-location/global studies (9/55; 16%). The majority (30/55; 55%) of studies focussed on the views and experiences of pharmacy professionals, and approximately a quarter (13/55; 24%) focussed on patient views, experiences, or behaviours. The benefits identified from the included literature were relatively consistent, focussing on access to care, reducing pressure on health systems, and improved patient autonomy. However, the list of risks identified was far more heterogenous, covering a range of themes, including, adverse effects of medication, inappropriate use of medication, and reduced intervention opportunities, and self-diagnoses delaying required care. The risks associated with medication self-selection were more frequently discussed when compared with benefits. ConclusionsAlthough this review identified risks and benefits associated with medication self-selection more broadly, none of the included publications solely discussed PMEDs. More research is needed to fully understand the risks and benefits of the self-selection model for this classification of medicines.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Rapid Realist Review of the Role of Community Pharmacy in the Public Health Response to COVID-19 95%
- Active vaccine safety surveillance via a scalable, integrated system in Australian pharmacies 94%
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in analgesia prescribing in primary care in Ireland and England between 2014 and 2022 - a repeated cross-sectional study 93%
- Preclinical Efficacy in Investigator’s Brochures: Stakeholders’ views on measures to improve Completeness and Robustness 92%
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 93%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 92%
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 93%
- To Include or Not to Include? A prescription from the pharmacy on how to use active learning assisted screening in systematic reviews 91%
- Repurposing Existing Medications for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Protocol for a Rapid and Living Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 95%
- Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis 95%
- Perspectives of pharmacy employees on an inappropriate use of antimicrobials in Kathmandu, Nepal 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.