Back

Implementing an Electronic Health Record System in a Tertiary Care Surgical Oncology Setup A Mixed Method Analysis

Nellihela, A. P.; Gunaratne, K. S.; Bandaranayake, V. C.; Senevirathne, R. N.; Pathirana, T.; Gallala, M.; Asanthi, J.; Pirahanthan, K.; Karunanayake, S. N.; Abegunasekara, A.; Jayasinghe, T. S.; Senarathne, M.

2025-07-14 health informatics
10.1101/2025.07.12.25331172
Show abstract

ObjectiveIn Sri Lanka, resource limitations have led to the continued use of paper-based records for patient management. We implemented a cloud-based Electronic Health Record (EHR) system in a tertiary surgical oncology unit, running it alongside the existing paper system. The EHR provided authorised, real-time remote access to patient data, digital theatre scheduling, and facilitated multidisciplinary team collaboration. MethodsTwenty-six healthcare workers (consultants, medical officers, nursing officers, trainees, and clerical staff) completed an online questionnaire assessing the EHRs usability, user satisfaction, and impact on workflow. We prospectively tracked and compared key time metrics between the paper and EHR systems, including theatre list preparation times and cancer biopsy turnaround (biopsy-to-diagnosis interval), to evaluate efficiency gains. ResultsMost participants (84.6%) used the EHR routinely. Users rated the system as highly intuitive, user-friendly, easily accessible, and simple for data entry (mean ratings [~] 4.0 out of 5). Overall satisfaction was high (mean 4.31/5), though system speed was rated slightly lower (mean 3.92), and technical glitches were noted (mean 3.65). Adequate training was associated with significantly higher satisfaction (p<0.05), and satisfaction correlated with perceived intuitiveness (r=0.43) and ease of use (r=0.60). The EHR reduced average theatre list preparation time from 4 minutes 6 seconds (paper) to 2 minutes 24 seconds, saving approximately 1 minute 42 seconds per list(p<0.001). Similarly, the median biopsy-to-diagnosis interval decreased from 14.95 days with the paper process to 8.40 days with the EHRs notification system- an average reduction of 6.55 days(p<0.001). ConclusionImplementing a customised EHR system in a resource-limited surgical oncology setting significantly improved workflow efficiency, reduced diagnostic delays, and enhanced data accessibility and team coordination. Users reported high satisfaction, but challenges such as technical limitations, infrastructure issues, and resistance to change persist. Targeted training, supportive infrastructure, and stakeholder engagement are recommended to sustain the EHR integration and promote greater adoption. HighlightsO_LIElectronic health records enhance workflow, data access, and team collaboration. C_LIO_LIElectronic health records significantly reduced biopsy-to-diagnosis delays. C_LIO_LIHigh user satisfaction is associated with intuitive design and adequate training. C_LIO_LITechnical issues and system speed were primary challenges for users. C_LIO_LITargeted training and robust infrastructure are vital for successful implementation. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 0.8%
10.9%
2
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 1%
9.9%
4
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 3%
4.6%
5
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
6
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
4.4%
7
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 25%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Digital Health
based on 18 papers
Top 0.7%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
10
DIGITAL HEALTH
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 81%
2.7%
12
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 6%
2.7%
13
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
2.7%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
15
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 8%
2.2%
16
JMIR Formative Research
based on 31 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
17
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 14%
2.2%
18
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
19
BMJ Open Quality
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
20
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 9%
1.2%
23
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 85%
0.8%
24
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
25
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 6%
0.7%