Back

Implementing an Electronic Health Record System in a Tertiary Care Surgical Oncology Setup A Mixed Method Analysis

Nellihela, A. P.; Gunaratne, K. S.; Bandaranayake, V. C.; Senevirathne, R. N.; Pathirana, T.; Gallala, M.; Asanthi, J.; Pirahanthan, K.; Karunanayake, S. N.; Abegunasekara, A.; Jayasinghe, T. S.; Senarathne, M.

2025-07-14 health informatics
10.1101/2025.07.12.25331172 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIn Sri Lanka, resource limitations have led to the continued use of paper-based records for patient management. We implemented a cloud-based Electronic Health Record (EHR) system in a tertiary surgical oncology unit, running it alongside the existing paper system. The EHR provided authorised, real-time remote access to patient data, digital theatre scheduling, and facilitated multidisciplinary team collaboration. MethodsTwenty-six healthcare workers (consultants, medical officers, nursing officers, trainees, and clerical staff) completed an online questionnaire assessing the EHRs usability, user satisfaction, and impact on workflow. We prospectively tracked and compared key time metrics between the paper and EHR systems, including theatre list preparation times and cancer biopsy turnaround (biopsy-to-diagnosis interval), to evaluate efficiency gains. ResultsMost participants (84.6%) used the EHR routinely. Users rated the system as highly intuitive, user-friendly, easily accessible, and simple for data entry (mean ratings [~] 4.0 out of 5). Overall satisfaction was high (mean 4.31/5), though system speed was rated slightly lower (mean 3.92), and technical glitches were noted (mean 3.65). Adequate training was associated with significantly higher satisfaction (p<0.05), and satisfaction correlated with perceived intuitiveness (r=0.43) and ease of use (r=0.60). The EHR reduced average theatre list preparation time from 4 minutes 6 seconds (paper) to 2 minutes 24 seconds, saving approximately 1 minute 42 seconds per list(p<0.001). Similarly, the median biopsy-to-diagnosis interval decreased from 14.95 days with the paper process to 8.40 days with the EHRs notification system- an average reduction of 6.55 days(p<0.001). ConclusionImplementing a customised EHR system in a resource-limited surgical oncology setting significantly improved workflow efficiency, reduced diagnostic delays, and enhanced data accessibility and team coordination. Users reported high satisfaction, but challenges such as technical limitations, infrastructure issues, and resistance to change persist. Targeted training, supportive infrastructure, and stakeholder engagement are recommended to sustain the EHR integration and promote greater adoption. HighlightsO_LIElectronic health records enhance workflow, data access, and team collaboration. C_LIO_LIElectronic health records significantly reduced biopsy-to-diagnosis delays. C_LIO_LIHigh user satisfaction is associated with intuitive design and adequate training. C_LIO_LITechnical issues and system speed were primary challenges for users. C_LIO_LITargeted training and robust infrastructure are vital for successful implementation. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.0%
4
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
5
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
12
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
13
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
16
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
19
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
22
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%