Heat and Health Service Use: A Spatiotemporal Analysis
Chomik, R.; Bates, S.; Dey, C.; Dietz, C.; Lin, J.; Mao, L.; Newell, B.; Valencia Arroyo, B.; Davidson, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundWhile acute heatwaves are known to affect hospital presentations, less is known about broader health service use, regional disparities, or the effects of chronic climatic heat. MethodsWe analysed 20 years of weekly health service use data between 2002 and 2022 across all Australian Statistical Areas Level 4 (SA4s) geographies for four major health services: medical services (MBS), pharmaceuticals (PBS), hospital admissions, and emergency department (ED) presentations - by clinical category (cardiovascular, respiratory, mental health, other). Three population-weighted weather metrics were measured: weekly maximum temperature, heatwave events, and long-term climatic averages. Fixed-effects panel models were used to estimate short-term impacts of weather metrics on health service use while cross-sectional models were used to assess chronic exposure effects. FindingsAcute exposure to dry temperature heatwaves was consistently associated with increased ED and inpatient presentations for mental health, cardiovascular, and other conditions. Apparent temperature heatwaves, incorporating humidity, showed more variable effects. MBS consultations rose modestly, while PBS dispensing declined during heat events. Long-term exposure to higher average temperatures was linked to increased inpatient care even after adjusting for socioeconomic status, remoteness, and health workforce. Disadvantaged regions experienced amplified effects, while areas with higher outdoor work exposure showed suppressed mental health care use. InterpretationBoth acute and chronic heat exposures influenced health service demand across services and geographies during the study period. Heatwaves exacerbate existing healthcare inequalities and can disrupt access to medicines. Adaptation strategies must extend beyond hospitals to include primary and community-based care, with attention to population vulnerability and regional climate. FundingThe International Centre for Future Health Systems receives funding from The Ian Potter Foundation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 91%
- Evolving Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality in US Counties: A Longitudinal Study of Healthcare, Socioeconomic, and Vaccination Associations 91%
- Within-country heterogeneity in patterns of social contact relevant for tuberculosis infection transmission, prevention, and care 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nature-based social prescribing programmes: opportunities, challenges, and facilitators for implementation 89%
- A higher ratio of green spaces means a lower racial disparity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection rates: A nationwide study of the United States 89%
- Fidelity and adherence to a liquefied petroleum gas stove and fuel intervention: the multi-country Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Low uptake of COVID-19 prevention behaviours and high socioeconomic impact of lockdown measures in South Asia: evidence from a large-scale multi-country surveillance programme 89%
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 88%
- What Explains the Socioeconomic Status-Health Gradient? Evidence from Workplace COVID-19 Infections 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 mass testing in adult social care in England 88%
- Evidence-based public health messaging on the non-visual effects of ocular light exposure: A modified Delphi expert consensus 87%
- Project ITCH: Cross-sectional surveys to understand residential vector control attitudes and practices across New England 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.