Back

Smartphone-Based Bioelectric Coherence Index for Mental Health Diagnostics: A Digital Twin Study

Munro, G.

2025-07-11 health informatics
10.1101/2025.07.11.25331367 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMental health disorders affect over 1 billion people globally, with circadian rhythm disruption emerging as a key pathophysiological mechanism. Digital biomarkers offer potential for scalable assessment, but validation remains limited. ObjectiveTo develop and validate a Bioelectric Coherence Index (BCI) using smartphone sensors for circadian dysfunction assessment across 50 mental health conditions through digital twin simulation. MethodsWe developed a BCI using smartphone sensors (light exposure, sleep patterns, pupillometry) with the formula: BCI(t) = {middle dot}{Phi}(t) + {beta}{middle dot}{Delta}(t) - {gamma}{middle dot}{Psi}(t), integrating phase alignment, circadian amplitude, and temporal variability components. We simulated 1,000 virtual subjects (20 per condition) across 50 mental health conditions over 365 days, stratified by circadian impact tier. ResultsDigital twin validation achieved 71.2% diagnostic accuracy (95% CI: 68.8-73.6%) across all 50 conditions. Performance varied by circadian impact tier: Core Circadian conditions (87.3%), High Circadian (76.5%), Moderate Circadian (65.2%), and Lower Circadian (52.8%). Cross-validation demonstrated robust performance with minimal overfitting. External benchmarking against published chronotherapy literature showed strong correlations (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). ConclusionsThis digital twin validation provides preliminary computational evidence for smartphone-based circadian assessment utility across diverse mental health conditions. The tier-based performance hierarchy aligns with circadian biology principles. Clinical validation through prospective trials remains essential before clinical application.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
7
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
21
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
22
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%