In-line chlorination for drinking water in rural Odisha, India: a randomized controlled implementation trial
Lowe, J.; Prathap, V.; Kamei, A.; Giri, S.; Sahoo, K. C.; Kremer, M.; Maffioli, E. M.; Pickering, A.
Show abstract
In-line chlorination automatically treats drinking water in piped water systems or at points-of-collection, substantially reducing morbidity and mortality while averting the burden of water treatment on individuals. Approximately 2.3 billion people globally use fecally contaminated drinking water infrastructure that is potentially compatible with in-line chlorination. In India, the Ministry of Jal Shaktis Jal Jeevan Mission has increased access to piped drinking water among rural households, however, water is often supplied intermittently without treatment. The aims of this study were to 1) test installation and operational procedures for in-line chlorination in rural drinking water systems, 2) evaluate acceptability and adoption of chlorinated water, and 3) assess reductions in drinking water fecal contamination, including with antibiotic resistant bacteria. We conducted a randomized controlled implementation trial of in-line chlorination in 20 villages in Rayagada district, Odisha, India over a 1-year period. Data collection included a baseline and post-intervention census (N=914) and surveys with a random subset of households over six timepoints (N=1,041) to assess water quality. We discuss operational challenges, including maintaining consistent chlorine dosing and addressing taste and odor preferences. In the treatment group, we detected free chlorine residual in 51% of tap water samples; this prevalence rose to 80% after increasing the target dose. Despite taste complaints in treatment communities, participants continued using piped water as their primary drinking water source. Individuals in treatment communities reported reduced time spent manually treating their drinking water, a responsibility borne by women in 92% of households. Treatment reduced E. coli prevalence by 70% in household tap water and by 47% in stored water, as well as reduced the presence of antibiotic resistant E. coli. In-line chlorination can lead to better quality water, lower the time burden of water treatment, and increase user adoption of chlorinated drinking water, but achieving this requires dedicated implementation and monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial Heterogeneity Of Neighborhood-Level Water And Sanitation Access In Informal Urban Settlements: A Cross-Sectional Case Study In Beira, Mozambique 95%
- Environmental surveillance of soil-transmitted helminths and other enteric pathogens in settings without networked wastewater infrastructure 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using geographic information systems to link population estimates to wastewater surveillance data in New York State, USA 93%
- Low-cost, local production of a safe and effective disinfectant for resource-constrained communities 93%
- The impact of a demand-side sanitation and hygiene promotion intervention on sustained behavior change and health in Amhara, Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative assessment of fecal contamination in multiple environmental sample types in urban communities in Dhaka, Bangladesh using SaniPath microbial approach 95%
- Water Treatment and E. Coli in Drinking Water: Household Responses to (Invisible) Water Quality Risks 95%
- The impact of rainfall on drinking water quality in Antananarivo, Madagascar 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of flushing procedures on drinking water biostability and invasion susceptibility in distribution systems 95%
- Source-to-Tap Investigation of the Occurrence of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in a Full-Scale Chloraminated Drinking Water System 94%
- Impact of operational conditions on drinking water biofilm dynamics and coliform invasion potential 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.