Health, Equity, and Economic Impacts of a Nicotine Product Standard in the United States for People With and Without Major Depression
Skolnick, S.; Brouwer, A.; Cheng, C.; Tam, J.
Show abstract
ImportanceThe U.S. FDA has proposed a product standard that would reduce the nicotine content and addictiveness of cigarettes. It is unclear what impact this would have on economic outcomes or priority populations who are disproportionately harmed by tobacco use, such as people with major depression. ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term health and economic impacts of a nicotine product standard for the U.S. population by depression status. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA microsimulation model was developed and calibrated to National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) 2005-2023 data on smoking, vaping, and depressive episodes. The anticipated effects of the nicotine product standard on smoking and vaping were obtained from an FDA expert elicitation and used to simulate the policy from 2027-2100. ExposureSmoking and vaping. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Health outcomes included prevalence of smoking and vaping, deaths, and life years gained overall and by major depression status. Economic outcomes include direct costs to the healthcare system and societal costs. ResultsUnder the proposed nicotine product standard, smoking is projected to decline to <1% for people with and without depression by 2100. The policy is estimated to avert 1.7 million premature deaths and lead to 74.7 million life years gained. Depression prevalence is also expected to decline, with 8.5 million fewer cases of depression estimated. Longer life expectancies under the policy are projected to increase medical costs by $296 billion, while also increasing worker productivity by $266 billion with an additional $1.2 trillion in consumer spending. Conclusions and RelevanceTimely implementation of a nicotine reduction strategy, either through a federal product standard or state-level sales restrictions, is cost-effective and could prevent millions of premature deaths and reduce smoking disparities by depression status.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
- Clinical Outcomes, Costs, and Cost-effectiveness of Strategies for People Experiencing Sheltered Homelessness During the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- Health impact and cost of COVID-19 prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- State-level disparities in cervical cancer prevention and outcomes in the U.S.: A modeling study 88%
- Asian Lung Cancer Absolute Risk Models for lung cancer mortality based on China Kadoorie Biobank 88%
- Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers with mood or anxiety disorders: a double-blind randomized trial 93%
- E-cigarette use and Respiratory Symptoms in Residents of the United States: A BRFSS Report 92%
- Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in daily cigarette consumption among smokers: a population study in England, 2008-2023 94%
- Cost Comparison and Spending on Tobacco Products: Evidence from A Nationally Representative Sample of Adult E-Cigarette Users 93%
- Varenicline Versus Cytisine for Smoking Cessation in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 96%
- Effect of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems on Cigarette Abstinence in Smokers with no Plans to Quit: Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 93%
- Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.