Back

Using spatial statistics to infer game-theoretic interactions in an agent-based model of cancer cells

Leither, S.; Strobl, M.; Scott, J. G.; Dolson, E.

2025-07-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.07.09.664005 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drug resistance in cancer is shaped not only by evolutionary processes but also by eco-evolutionary interactions between tumor subpopulations. These interactions can support the persistence of resistant cells even in the absence of treatment, undermining standard aggressive therapies and motivating drug holiday-based approaches that leverage ecological dynamics. A key challenge in implementing such strategies is efficiently identifying interaction between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant subpopulations. Evolutionary game theory provides a framework for characterizing these interactions. We investigate whether spatial patterns in single time-point images of cell populations can reveal the underlying game theoretic interactions between sensitive and resistant cells. To achieve this goal, we develop an agent-based model in which cell reproduction is governed by local game-theoretic interactions. We compute a suite of spatial statistics on single time-point images from the agent-based model under a range of games being played between cells. We quantify the informativeness of each spatial statistic and demonstrate that a simple machine learning model can classify the type of game being played. Our findings suggest that spatial structure contains sufficient information to infer ecological interactions. This work represents a step toward clinically viable tools for identifying cell-cell interactions in tumors, supporting the development of ecologically informed cancer therapies. Author summaryDrug resistance is a major challenge in cancer treatment, often leading to relapse despite initially successful therapy. While mutations are a key driver, ecological interactions between drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells also play a critical role. These interactions are complex and dynamic, and few molecular biomarkers exist, making them difficult to study and account for in treatment planning. We use evolutionary game theory, a framework for quantifying interactions between cells, to investigate whether it is possible to infer these interactions using just a single time-point image of the cells. We develop an agent-based model where cells reproduce based on local interactions and quantify the resulting patterns in how cells are distributed across space using a suite of spatial statistics. We find that specific interaction types produce distinct spatial patterns that are evident in these metrics, and we train a simple machine learning model to classify the interaction type based on the metrics. Our results suggest that spatial data alone can offer valuable insights into tumor dynamics, potentially enabling more informed and adaptable cancer treatments based on eco-evolutionary principles.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
19.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
7
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
8
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
11
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
14
Biostatistics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
16
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
17
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
20
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%