Efficacy of behavioural activation in treating prenatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yisma, E.; Muyambi, K.; Othman, S.; Walsh, S.; Bressington, D.; Steen, M.; Gray, R.; Fereday, J.; Lassi, Z. S.; Jones, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrenatal depression is a significant and increasingly recognised public health issue, with symptoms often intensifying as pregnancy progresses. Behavioural activation is an established treatment for depression; however, its effectiveness in treating depression during the prenatal period has not been systematically evaluated. ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of behavioural activation against any comparators in reducing depressive symptoms in pregnant women. MethodsWe searched six primary databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid Embase, Ovid Emcare, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid PsycINFO) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing behavioural activation with comparators for depression in pregnant women. We also searched for major international clinical trial registries and manually reviewed reference lists of included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations risk-of-bias 2 tool. We calculated a random-effects, inverse-variance weighting meta-analysis to examine the association between behavioural activation and depressive symptoms during the prenatal period. ResultsOf the 4,129 records identified, four RCTs from three countries comparing behavioural activation with comparators for the treatment of depression in pregnant women met the inclusion criteria. One study was rated as low risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed that behavioural activation was associated with a small reduction in depressive symptoms among pregnant women diagnosed with depression, compared to treatment as usual (standardised mean difference = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.10), with high heterogeneity across studies (I{superscript 2} = 82.8%). Two of the four included studies reported on adverse events; however, none reported any harm resulting from participation in the treatment trials. ConclusionsThis systematic review indicated that behavioural activation may be more effective than treatment as usual in reducing depressive symptoms during the prenatal period. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to limitations in the quality of the available evidence.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 97%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Social connectedness as a determinant of mental health: A scoping review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of social restrictions, loss of social support, and loss of maternal autonomy on postpartum depression in 1 to 12-months postpartum women during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Exploring the Efficacy and Potential of Large Language Models for Depression: A Systematic Review 93%
- Virtual mindfulness interventions to promote well-being in young adults: A mixed-methods systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence of mental ill-health in women during pregnancy and after childbirth during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis 95%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 94%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 95%
- The COVID in the Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study: protocol for a longitudinal study of parental mental health, social interactions, physical growth, and cognitive development of infants during the pandemic 94%
- Athletes’ access to, attitudes towards, and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 94%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 93%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.