Back

Expanding the repertoire of chemically induced covalent neoantigens

Zhou, C.; Huang, W.; Jin, X.; Wu, H.; McGregor, L. M.; Schirle, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.

2025-07-12 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.07.08.663715 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ubiquitin-proteasome system generates peptide fragments that are displayed on MHC-I molecules. Recent studies revealed that covalent small molecules can hijack this process, leading to the presentation of hapten-modified peptide fragments, or covalent neoantigens. Here, we report a chemical proteomics platform to systematically investigate this process and harness covalent neoantigens for immune cell recruitment and activation. Using a bioorthogonal cysteine-reactive probe (IA-mTz), we demonstrate that diverse intracellular proteins can be modified, processed, and presented as covalent neoantigens across multiple cell lines. Mass spectrometry confirmed the presence of IA-mTz-modified peptides within the MHC-I immunopeptidome, and structural modeling revealed stable peptide-MHC-I interactions. We further integrated a bioorthogonal strategy that enables immune engagement: IA-mTz-modified cells conjugated with trans-cyclooctene (TCO)-IgG elicited Fc receptor activation in a reporter assay, supporting immune recruitment via antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis. This approach was extended to additional cysteine-reactive probes and to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), a common skin sensitizer, which we show induces covalent neoantigen formation in a cell- and HLA-dependent manner. These findings reveal a previously underappreciated breadth of covalent neoantigen formation and provide a generalizable strategy for immune targeting of covalent neoantigens.

Published in Nature Chemical Biology (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.