Back

Enhanced cleavage of genomic CCR5 using CASX2Max

Hodge, C. A.; Donegan, N. P.; Armstrong, D. A.; Howell, A. L.; Hayden, M. S.

2025-07-11 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.08.663680 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Development of novel CRISPR/Cas systems enhances opportunities for gene editing to treat infectious diseases, cancer, and genetic disorders. We evaluated CasX2 (PlmCas12e), a class II CRISPR system derived from Planctomycetes, a non-pathogenic bacterium present in aquatic and terrestrial soils. CasX2 offers several advantages over Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) and Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9), including its smaller size, distinct protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) requirements, staggered cleavage cuts that promote homology-directed repair, and no known pre-existing immunity in humans. A recent study reported that a three amino acid substitution in CasX2 significantly enhanced cleavage activity (1). Therefore, we compared cleavage efficiency and double-stranded break repair characteristics between the native CasX2 and the variant, CasX2Max, for cleavage of CCR5, a gene that encodes the CCR5 receptor important for HIV-1 infection. Two CasX2 single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed that flanked the 32 bases deleted in the natural CCR5 {Delta}32 mutation. Nanopore sequencing demonstrated that CasX2 using sgRNAs with spacers of 17 nucleotides (nt), 20 nt or 23 nt in length were ineffective at cleaving genomic CCR5. In contrast, CasX2Max using sgRNAs with 20 nt and 23 nt spacer lengths, enabled robust genomic cleavage of CCR5. Structural modeling indicated that two of the CasX2Max substitutions enhanced sgRNA-DNA duplex stability, while the third improved DNA strand alignment within the catalytic site. These structural changes likely underlie the increased activity of CasX2Max in cellular gene excision. In sum, CasX2Max consistently outperformed native CasX2 across all assays and represents a superior gene-editing platform for therapeutic applications.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
24.6%
2
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.6%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
6
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.3%
8
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
13
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
17
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
18
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
21
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%