Zoonotic disease preparedness among frontline healthcare workers in Ghana: Assessing literacy and behaviors in a One Health context
West, K. P.; Sznajder, K. K.; Sauve, H. E.; Hwang, G.; Roba, K. T.; Baatiema, L.; Kenu, E.; Noora, C. L.; Gizaw, A. T.; Yilma, A. N.
Show abstract
Zoonotic diseases pose a growing global health threat, particularly in low-resource settings where human-animal-environmental interfaces are common. Although Ghana has adopted One Health policies, limited evidence exists on frontline healthcare workers (FHWs) zoonosis preparedness. Thus, this study assessed FHWs knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to zoonoses and One Health in Ghanas Ada East district. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 250 FHWs across 18 selected health facilities. A 54-item questionnaire measured knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding priority zoonoses, Ebola virus disease, and the One Health approach. Scores were scaled to 100% and dichotomized using Blooms cut-off, with >60% representing "good knowledge," "positive attitudes," or "good practices." Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of good knowledge and practices. According to this study, while 79.2% of FHWs scored [≥]60% on the total knowledge scale, classified as "good knowledge" of zoonoses, Ebola virus disease, and One Health, only 22.4% correctly identified >60% of listed zoonoses. Ebola-specific knowledge was high, though misconceptions about transmission and treatment persisted. Only 6.8% scored [≥]60% on the attitude scale, reflecting limited confidence and widespread concern about personal safety, institutional readiness, and community stigma. While 47.2% demonstrated "good" prevention and control practices, institutional protocol use and intersectoral collaboration were limited. Rabies-focused training increased odds of good knowledge (AOR = 3.25, 95% CI: 1.04-11.1) and practices (AOR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.07-5.87). In-facility training improved practices (AOR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.34-5.92), whereas government-delivered training and infrequent climate-health engagement were linked to poor knowledge and practices. Gaps in zoonoses literacy and institutional preparedness were evident among FHWs. Targeted staff retraining, peer-led mentorship, and expanded rabies training may offer practical entry points for One Health capacity building. Addressing stigma and embedding climate-health content into community-based risk communication may improve frontline readiness.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- International healthcare workers’ experiences and perceptions of the 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak 95%
- The role of Rwanda Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program graduates and residents in response to the first Marburg Virus Disease outbreak in Rwanda 95%
- Gaps and Opportunities for Data Systems and Economics to Support Priority Setting for Climate-Sensitive Infectious Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Rapid Scoping Review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Child exposure to animal feces and zoonotic pathogens in northwest Ecuador: A mixed-methods study. 95%
- Enhancing national cholera surveillance using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs): a mixed methods evaluation 95%
- Development and validation of a framework to improve neglected tropical diseases surveillance and response at the sub-national level in Kenya 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards a bottom-up understanding of antimicrobial use and resistance on the farm: A knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey across livestock systems in five African countries 95%
- Have you heard of Rift Valley fever? Findings from a multi-country study in East and Central Africa 95%
- Evaluation of a Digital Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool for Malaria Vector Control: Three Country Mixed Methods Pilot Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mpox knowledge and perception in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Understanding Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Ebola Virus Disease: A Multi-Site Mixed Methods Survey on Preparedness in Rwanda 94%
- Assessing the value and knowledge gains from an online tick identification and tick-borne disease management course for the Southeastern United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of risk factors associated with and practices of cattle farmers in Kirehe District Rwanda with respect to vector-borne and zoonotic pathogens 94%
- Exploring the role of the private sector in tuberculosis detection and management in Lima, Peru: a mixed-methods patient pathway analysis 94%
- Leptospira infection in rural areas of Urabá region, Colombia: a prospective study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.