Back

Intervention provision and engagement in Colombia's PAPSIVI: a national psychosocial support service for over half a million victims of armed conflict

Constable Fernandez, C.; Acosta-Ortiz, A.; Garcia Duran, M. C.; Pappa, E.; Saunders, R.; Solmi, F.; Idrobo, F.; Bell, V.

2025-07-08 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.07.08.25331104 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundColombias PAPSIVI program is the worlds largest psychosocial support service for victims of armed conflict providing support for over half a million civilians. However, service delivery has only previously been examined in small studies, making it difficult to understand to what extent PAPSIVI delivers interventions that are adequately targeted to individuals with the most serious exposures to the armed conflict, and to what extent attendees remain engaged with interventions. MethodsWe investigated how different conflict exposures related to PAPSIVI intervention assignment and engagement. We linked anonymised national data from the register of victims of the Colombian armed conflict to data from N = 534,818 PAPSIVI attenders. Analysis used logistic and linear regression with cluster robust standard errors, adjusted for a range of potential confounders. ResultsIntervention types were broadly provided in line with PAPSIVI guidelines, with victims experiencing torture, sexual violence, and forced recruitment more likely to receive individual sessions, while community-level impacts received community interventions. Female sex, ethnic minority status, and receiving state-subsidised healthcare were associated with higher intervention engagement. Those with previous mental health diagnoses had increased odds of attending individual or family sessions but lower odds of group or community sessions, consistent with recommendations for more intensive intervention for those with higher mental health needs. 29% of individual session attendees only received a single session, potentially indicating early dropout or unsuitable service provision for a proportion of attendees. ConclusionsThis study provides insights into support provision for civilian victims of conflict indicating that psychosocial support provision can be managed effectively at very large scales.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.1%
2
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
6
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
9
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
21
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%