Linear predictive coding electroencephalography algorithms predict Parkinson's disease mortality using out-of-sample tests
Jamshidi, S.; Espinoza, A. I.; Heinzman, J. T.; May, P.; Uc, E. Y.; Narayanan, N.; Dasgupta, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundParkinsons disease (PD) increases mortality is difficult to predict because of its heterogeneity and the availability of very few reliable which prognostic markers. ObjectivesWe used electroencephalography (EEG) and the Linear Predictive Coding EEG Algorithm for PD (LEAPD) for binary classification of 3-year mortality status and correlation between LEAPD indices and time to death. Methods2-minutes resting-state EEG from 94 PD patients (59 channels, 22 deceased within 3 years of recording) was used for binary classification of 3-year mortality status. Single-channel classification using a balanced dataset of 44 was performed using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). Robustness was evaluated by truncating the recordings. LOOCV Spearmans correlation coefficient ({rho}) was obtained between LEAPD indices and time to death. Optimum hyperparameters obtained from a balanced training dataset of 30 were tested on the remaining 64 patients by 10,000 randomized comparisons of 7 vs 7, using 5 channel combinations Hyperparameters for the best {rho}, using the same training dataset were for the out-of-sample correlation for the remaining 7 deceased. ResultsIn LOOCV analysis several channels yielded 100% accuracy with robust performance from five. The correlations ranged between {rho} =-0.59 to-0.86; were significant after adjusting for age, cognitive and motor impairment. Out-of-sample testing using the best-performing 5-channel combination yielded a mean accuracy of 83%. Out-of-sample Spearmans {rho} was-0.82. ConclusionLEAPD provides a robust approach for binary classification of mortality in PD from resting-state EEG. LEAPD indices correlate with survival duration, independent of clinical predictors, suggesting potential utility as a continuous neurophysiological biomarker.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Progression of daily-life tremor measures in early Parkinson disease: a longitudinal continuous monitoring study 95%
- RBDAct: Home screening of REM sleep behaviour disorder based on wrist actigraphy in Parkinson’s patients 93%
- Plasma MIA, CRP, and albumin predict cognitive decline in Parkinson’s Disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in electrophysiological aperiodic activity during cognitive control in Parkinson's disease 94%
- Common signatures of differential microRNA expression in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease brains 92%
- White matter microstructure in Parkinson’s disease with and without elevated REM sleep muscle tone 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time perception reflects individual differences in motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease 94%
- Predicting Longitudinal Disease Severity for Individuals with Parkinson's Disease using Functional MRI and Machine Learning Prognostic Models 94%
- Online unsupervised performance-based cognitive testing: a feasible and reliable approach to scalable cognitive phenotyping of Parkinson’s patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Crowdsourcing digital health measures to predict Parkinson's disease severity: the Parkinson's Disease Digital Biomarker DREAM Challenge 95%
- Quantifying Device Type and Handedness Biases in a Remote Parkinson’s Disease AI-Powered Assessment 92%
- A Machine-Learning Based Objective Measure for ALS Disease Severity 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.