Title: Family Caregivers' Experience in the Provision of Palliative Care for Adult Cancer Patients in Low and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol
Karunarathna, K. T.; Uduwela, V.; Godage, G.; Isuruni, Y.; Seneviwikrama, K. L. M. D.
Show abstract
IntroductionIn contrast to high-income countries, palliative care services are limited and largely undertaken by informal caregivers, often family members, in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). This review aims to explore the family caregiver experience in providing palliative care to adult cancer patients in LMICs. Methods and AnalysisThis qualitative systematic review will be conducted using a comprehensive search strategy on PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO without language or date restrictions. Open Universitys CORE database will be searched for grey literature. Review questions will follow the PICo framework (population, phenomena of interest, and contexts). Qualitative or mixed-method studies on the experience of family caregivers of adult cancer patients (above 18 years) receiving palliative care in LMICs will be included. Study quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Findings will be synthesized using meta-aggregation, or with a narrative synthesis if pooling is not feasible. Review process will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence and will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. Ethics and DisseminationNo ethical approval is required as the study involves secondary data analysis of published literature. Ethical principles of accurate reporting and transparency will be upheld. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed open-access journals and presented at academic conferences. Recommendations will be shared with policymakers and healthcare organizations responsible for the provision of palliative care for cancer patients in LMICs. PROSPERO registration numberCRD420251010556 Article SummaryO_ST_ABSStrengths and Limitations of this studyC_ST_ABSO_LIFour databases, as well as grey literature, will be searched using the extensive search strategy by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in systematic reviews and cancer care in LMICs. C_LIO_LIA rigorous methodology will be adhered to throughout the study as per the JBI guidelines for qualitative systematic reviews. C_LIO_LIWhile language was not limited in the search, due to translation constraints, only selected non-English articles will be reviewed. This limitation may introduce language bias through the exclusion of some non-English qualitative study articles. C_LIO_LIDue to the limited number of qualitative studies on cancer palliative care in LMICs and possible low quality of available studies, the certainty of evidence generated through this systematic review may be limited. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 93%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 95%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 94%
- Bereavement care for ethnic minority communities: A systematic review of access to, models of, outcomes from, and satisfaction with, service provision 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 89%
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 88%
- Chest wall abnormalities in Swiss childhood cancer survivors 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preventing respiratory illness in older adults aged 60 years and above living in long-term care: A rapid overview of reviews 90%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 90%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial toxicity among cancer patients, survivors, and their families in the United Kingdom: a scoping review 95%
- Challenges to self-isolation among contacts of cases of COVID-19: a national telephone survey in Wales 89%
- A step-by-step Researcher’s Guide to the use of an AI-based transformer in epidemiology: an exploratory analysis of ChatGPT using the STROBE checklist for observational studies 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.