Back

XpressO-Melanoma: An Explainable Deep Learning Model for the Prediction of BRAF V600 Mutation Status in Cutaneous Melanomas

R Rao, V.; Phung, T.; Sukhadia, S. S.

2025-07-07 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.07.03.662694 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BRAF V600E mutations are critical oncogenic drivers in cutaneous melanoma, influencing treatment decisions and outcomes. However, conventional molecular assays face limitations, including tissue availability, cost, and access. To address this, we present an explainable deep learning model that predicts BRAF V600E mutation status directly from diagnostic whole-slide images (WSIs) of skin cutaneous melanoma. Using histopathological WSIs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and their corresponding mutation labels (BRAF wildtype vs. BRAF V600E), we trained a weakly supervised deep learning pipeline, XpressO, to identify tumor regions of interest (ROIs) predictive of BRAF mutation status. The model outputs attention heatmaps highlighting spatially relevant diagnostic features and computes a combined probability score from the top ten attention regions per WSI. These regions are further reviewed by a pathologist for biological appropriateness. On an independent test set, the model achieved an AUC of 0.79 with balanced precision and recall, correctly identifying 7 of 8 BRAF V600E mutant cases. This demonstrates the models ability to capture phenotypic correlates of mutation status and highlights the potential of computational pathology in precision oncology. Our approach offers a scalable, interpretable, and cost-effective alternative to molecular testing, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
11
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
16
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%