How Weak Relational Ties and Counterproductive Communication Sustain Collaborative Challenges in Vocational Rehabilitation for People on Long-term Sick Leave due to Common Mental Disorders: A Case Study in Denmark
Martiny, F.; Kousgaard, M. B.; Jauernik, C.; Kjellberg, P. K.; Rozing, M.; Waldorff, F.; Kristensen, M. A. T.
Show abstract
2PurposeExplore why collaborative challenges emerge in vocational rehabilitation for citizens on long-term sick leave due to common mental disorders (CMDs), and how they are experienced and navigated by key actors in the Danish sick leave system: citizens, caseworkers (CWs), and general practitioners (GPs). MethodsA case study in two Danish municipalities, including semi-structured interviews with seven citizens, seven GPs and six focus group interviews with 31 CWs. The data were inductively analysed via systematic text condensation followed by abductive analysis using relational coordination theory. ResultsThe lack of shared goals among key actors led them to campaign for their agendas, turning collaboration into a competition over the agenda. Limited shared knowledge resulted in repeated efforts to clarify expectations, making collaboration feel "colossally labouring." A lack of mutual trust and respect triggered distancing communication strategies, resulting in a relational divide. ConclusionLack of relational coordination, marked by weak relational ties and counterproductive communication, explains how collaborative challenges emerge and persist in vocational rehabilitation for people on long-term sick leave due to CMDs. The self-perpetuating nature of these dynamics highlights the need for rethinking how organisational structures can promote relational coordination. Future research should investigate the contextual factors influencing relational coordination.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Mapping rehabilitation pathways after cardiac surgery: Identifying key points for patient involvement and gaps in care 95%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 94%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 94%
- Transnational adoptees in healthcare: barriers, resources, and needs 93%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 94%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 93%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 93%
- The Acceptability of a Tobacco Dependency Treatment for NHS Staff in the North East of England: A Mixed-Methods Study 91%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.