Back

The effect of music interventions in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Navarro, L.; Mallah, N. E. Z.; Nowak, W.; Pardo-Seco, J.; Gomez-Carballa, A.; Pischedda, S.; Martinon-Torres, F.; Salas, A.

2025-07-07 neurology
10.1101/2025.07.03.25330837 medRxiv
Show abstract

Several disciplines have approached the relationship between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and music, but most of this understanding comes from cognitive sciences. This complex relationship has been studied by exploring how music-based interventions (MI) can benefit individuals with ASD. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesize a range of evidence regarding the therapeutic effects of music on different aspects, including communication, behavior, social engagement, attention, and quality of life for those with ASD. Additionally, it contextualizes these effects within current research on the musical perception and processing abilities of ASD individuals, emphasizing how they perceive and process music. The studies reviewed employ a variety of methodologies, from randomized controlled trials to qualitative research, showcasing a wide array of interventions such as active music-making, music listening, and improvisational techniques. Despite substantial heterogeneity across studies, the findings point to a moderate overall benefit of MI, particularly in areas such as social interaction, expressive language, and quality of life. Given the evidence supporting the context-sensitive and domain-specific benefits of musical abilities in individuals with ASD, along with the positive outcomes highlighted in various studies, we conclude that music represents a valuable therapeutic tool for ASD. It engages individuals on emotional, cognitive, and social levels, providing a non-invasive and enjoyable way to enhance therapeutic outcomes. Future research should focus on individual differences, harmonization of outcome measures, and long-term effectiveness, paving the way for more personalized and neurodiversity-affirming intervention models.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.9%
2
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
3
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.8%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
9
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%