Balancing Accuracy and Actionability: An Assessment of Minimal-Input Wastewater Models for COVID-19 Prediction
Lariscy, L. M.; Lott, M. E.; Handel, A.; Foley, A. M.; Melendez-Declet, C.; Metsker, L.; Lipp, E. K.
Show abstract
Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) is a valuable tool for surveillance of infectious diseases like COVID-19, yet balancing prediction accuracy with practical deployment remains challenging, particularly in low- resource, low-prevalence, and early warning contexts. We analyzed a two-and-a-half-year dataset from Athens-Clarke County, Georgia (USA) to compare approaches for predicting COVID-19 cases from SARS-CoV-2 wastewater data. We evaluated the effects of extraction replicates and use of quantitative versus detection frequency data on model performance using random forest and linear models. Results show that two extraction replicates generally suffice for reliable prediction, supporting efficient resource use. Combined viral load and detection frequency produced the strongest models, but detection frequency alone predicted new COVID-19 cases more accurately than viral load alone and was less sensitive to RT-qPCR instrumentation changes, making it a practical alternative when quantification is unreliable/infeasible. Linear models predicted new cases more accurately than random forest models, offering a resource-efficient option for monitoring wastewater trends. Following declines in clinical testing in spring 2022, wastewater- based models estimated substantially higher case counts than were reported, underscoring WBEs role for ongoing surveillance of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. These findings provide practical guidance for optimizing WBE implementation, particularly where early warning and resource constraints are significant factors. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIAnalysis of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater revealed that presence/absence rates in wastewater predicted new COVID-19 cases better than viral quantity alone C_LIO_LITwo extraction replicates was sufficient for acceptable prediction accuracy C_LIO_LILinear regression models more accurately predicted new cases than random forest C_LIO_LIAfter clinical testing efforts diminished, wastewater models predicted higher case counts than were reported C_LI GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=162 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25330828v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@189e7b8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cc1102org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1709ed1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cab23b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking the temporal variation of COVID-19 surges through wastewater-based epidemiology during the peak of the pandemic: a six-month long study in Charlotte, North Carolina 98%
- Wastewater to clinical case (WC) ratio of COVID-19 identifies insufficient clinical testing, onset of new variants of concern and population immunity in urban communities 98%
- COVID-19 wastewater surveillance in rural communities: Comparison of lagoon and pumping station samples 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity of wastewater-based epidemiology for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a low prevalence setting 98%
- Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 RNA Wastewater Monitoring Across a Range of Scales Correlates with Total and Regional COVID-19 Burden in a Well-Defined Urban Population 98%
- Metrics to relate COVID-19 wastewater data to clinical testing dynamics 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nationwide trends in COVID-19 cases and SARS-CoV-2 wastewater concentrations in the United States 99%
- Evaluation of sampling frequency and normalization of SARS-CoV-2 wastewater concentrations for capturing COVID-19 burdens in the community 97%
- A High-Throughput Microfluidic Quantitative PCR Platform for the Simultaneous Quantification of Pathogens, Fecal Indicator Bacteria, and Microbial Source Tracking Markers 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lognormal distributions capture site-specific variability in enteric virus concentrations in wastewater 98%
- Meta-analyses on SARS-CoV-2 Viral Titers in Wastewater and Their Correlations to Epidemiological Indicators 97%
- Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater during New York City’s second wave of COVID-19: Sewershed-level trends and relationships to publicly available clinical testing data 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unravelling the early warning capability of wastewater surveillance for COVID-19: A temporal study on SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection and need for the escalation 96%
- Predictive power of wastewater for nowcasting infectious disease transmission: a retrospective case study of five sewershed areas in Louisville, Kentucky 96%
- How early into the outbreak can surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater tell us? 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.