Back

Balancing Accuracy and Actionability: An Assessment of Minimal-Input Wastewater Models for COVID-19 Prediction

Lariscy, L. M.; Lott, M. E.; Handel, A.; Foley, A. M.; Melendez-Declet, C.; Metsker, L.; Lipp, E. K.

2025-07-05 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.07.03.25330828 medRxiv
Show abstract

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) is a valuable tool for surveillance of infectious diseases like COVID-19, yet balancing prediction accuracy with practical deployment remains challenging, particularly in low- resource, low-prevalence, and early warning contexts. We analyzed a two-and-a-half-year dataset from Athens-Clarke County, Georgia (USA) to compare approaches for predicting COVID-19 cases from SARS-CoV-2 wastewater data. We evaluated the effects of extraction replicates and use of quantitative versus detection frequency data on model performance using random forest and linear models. Results show that two extraction replicates generally suffice for reliable prediction, supporting efficient resource use. Combined viral load and detection frequency produced the strongest models, but detection frequency alone predicted new COVID-19 cases more accurately than viral load alone and was less sensitive to RT-qPCR instrumentation changes, making it a practical alternative when quantification is unreliable/infeasible. Linear models predicted new cases more accurately than random forest models, offering a resource-efficient option for monitoring wastewater trends. Following declines in clinical testing in spring 2022, wastewater- based models estimated substantially higher case counts than were reported, underscoring WBEs role for ongoing surveillance of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. These findings provide practical guidance for optimizing WBE implementation, particularly where early warning and resource constraints are significant factors. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIAnalysis of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater revealed that presence/absence rates in wastewater predicted new COVID-19 cases better than viral quantity alone C_LIO_LITwo extraction replicates was sufficient for acceptable prediction accuracy C_LIO_LILinear regression models more accurately predicted new cases than random forest C_LIO_LIAfter clinical testing efforts diminished, wastewater models predicted higher case counts than were reported C_LI GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=162 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25330828v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@189e7b8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cc1102org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1709ed1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cab23b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.6%
2
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
6
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
7
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
8
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
11
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
13
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
17
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
19
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
20
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
22
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
23
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%