Back

Collecting Mental Health Services Information from Institutions of Higher Education to Link with Student Mental Health: A Successful Pilot

Aluri, J.; Vyletel, B.; Voichoski, E.; Mercado, A.; Haddad, J.; Henry, H.; Bell, J.; Johnston, A.; DeVinney, A.; Eisenberg, D.; Lipson, S.

2025-07-08 public and global health
10.1101/2025.07.03.25330219 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFew studies have evaluated student mental health services at institutions of higher education. Generating datasets that link institutional health services data to mental health data of students at those institutions will be a key step forward in identifying evidence-based best practices. ObjectiveTo pilot the linking of data collected by an established national student mental health survey with data collected about institutional mental health services. MethodsInstitutional representatives who enrolled their student body in the Healthy Minds Survey (HMS) during the 2024-2025 academic year and who did not opt out (n = 111) were invited to complete a short survey. The survey queried policies on limits for the number of mental health sessions a student could access through their campus mental health services. Institutional characteristics for HMS schools were obtained from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). ResultsIn total, 77 of 111 eligible institutions (69%) responded to the survey. No institutional characteristic was significantly associated with response. ConclusionThis pilot demonstrated that partnering with existing research infrastructure to collect institutional mental health services data can achieve high response rates. Using existing research networks to collect institutional data and link them to student data represents a way forward for research on college mental health services.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.