Collecting Mental Health Services Information from Institutions of Higher Education to Link with Student Mental Health: A Successful Pilot
Aluri, J.; Vyletel, B.; Voichoski, E.; Mercado, A.; Haddad, J.; Henry, H.; Bell, J.; Johnston, A.; DeVinney, A.; Eisenberg, D.; Lipson, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundFew studies have evaluated student mental health services at institutions of higher education. Generating datasets that link institutional health services data to mental health data of students at those institutions will be a key step forward in identifying evidence-based best practices. ObjectiveTo pilot the linking of data collected by an established national student mental health survey with data collected about institutional mental health services. MethodsInstitutional representatives who enrolled their student body in the Healthy Minds Survey (HMS) during the 2024-2025 academic year and who did not opt out (n = 111) were invited to complete a short survey. The survey queried policies on limits for the number of mental health sessions a student could access through their campus mental health services. Institutional characteristics for HMS schools were obtained from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). ResultsIn total, 77 of 111 eligible institutions (69%) responded to the survey. No institutional characteristic was significantly associated with response. ConclusionThis pilot demonstrated that partnering with existing research infrastructure to collect institutional mental health services data can achieve high response rates. Using existing research networks to collect institutional data and link them to student data represents a way forward for research on college mental health services.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 93%
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 93%
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 93%
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 91%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 91%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 91%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Awareness, utility and preferences of campus-based mental health services at tertiary institutions in Harare Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study. 94%
- Mental health services implementation in Colombia – a systematic review 90%
- Correlates of behavioral and emotional disorders among school-going adolescents in Uganda 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination status among staff and faculty of a large, diverse University in Los Angeles 90%
- Associations of Telemedicine vs. In-Person Ambulatory Care Visits on Cancellation Rates and 30-Day Follow-Up Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits 88%
- COVID-19 booster vaccine attitudes and behaviors among university students and staff: the USC Trojan Pandemic Research Initiative 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.