The neuroimaging correlates of depression established across six large-scale datasets
Hamilton, K. M.; Luo, X. D.; Easley, T. O.; Ahmad, F.; Guo, T.; Jarukasemkit, S.; Modi, H.; Rincon, S. N.; Shelton, C.; Stahl, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Lenzini, P.; Hannon, K.; Bijsterbosch, J. D.
Show abstract
Neuroimaging data offers noninvasive insights into the structural and functional organization of the brain and is therefore commonly used to study the neuroimaging correlates of depression. To date, a substantial body of literature has suggested reduced size of subcortical regions and abnormal functional connectivity in frontal and default mode networks linked to depression. However, recent meta analyses have failed to identify significant converging correlates of depression across the literature such that a conclusive mapping of the neuroimaging correlates of depression remains elusive. Here we leveraged 23,417 participants across six datasets to comprehensively establish the neuroimaging correlates of depression. We found reductions in gray matter volume/ cortical surface area associated with depression in the frontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and insula, confirming prior studies showing the importance of prefrontal and default mode regions in depression. Our findings demonstrate multiple surprising results, including a lack of depression correlates in subcortical brain regions, significant depression correlates in somatomotor and visual regions, and limited functional connectivity findings. Overall, these results shed new light on key brain regions involved in the pathophysiology of depression, updating our understanding of the neuroimaging correlates of depression. We anticipate that these insights will inform further research into the role of sensorimotor and visual regions in depression and into the impact of heterogeneity on functional connectivity correlates of depression.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential and spatial expression meta-analysis of genes identified in genome-wide association studies of depression 96%
- Applying Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning to Predict Depression from Brain MRI and Identify Depression-Related Brain Biology 96%
- Meta-analysis of Reward Processing in Major Depressive Disorder Reveals Distinct Abnormalities within the Reward Circuit 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural brain alterations associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people: results across 21 international studies from the ENIGMA Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours consortium 95%
- Clinical Response to Neurofeedback in Major Depression Relates to Subtypes of Whole-Brain Activation Patterns During Training 94%
- Neuroimaging profiling identifies distinct brain maturational subtypes of youth with mood and anxiety disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneity in Depression: evidence for distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles 98%
- White matter tract integrity is reduced in major depression and in individuals with genetic liability for depression 96%
- Aberrant levels of cortical myelin distinguish individuals with unipolar depression from healthy controls 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuroimaging Insights into Brain Mechanisms of Early-onset Restrictive Eating Disorders 94%
- The overlapping genetic architecture of psychiatric disorders and cortical brain structure 93%
- Genetic overlap between multivariate measures of human functional brain connectivity and psychiatric disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel polygenic risk score links depression-related cortical transcriptomic changes to brain morphology and depressive symptoms in men 95%
- Brain Structural Correlates of an Impending Initial Major Depressive Episode 95%
- Intrinsic connectivity of the prefrontal cortex and striato-limbic system respectively differentiate Major Depressive from Generalized Anxiety Disorder 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.