Advancing In-Hospital Mortality Prediction for Acute Myocardial Infarction: an analysis from the American Heart Association Get-With-the-Guidelines Coronary Artery Disease Registry
Zhao, J.; Hong, H.; Fanaroff, A. C.; Zhong, S.; Bush, K. N. V.; Granger, C. B.; Huber, N.; Jackevicius, C. A.; Kindipan, I.; Li, S.; Lewis, P.; Osho, A. A.; Sather, J. A.; Sigal, S. L.; Thomas, K.; Ni, Z.; Hall, J. L.; Jacobs, A. K.; Goyal, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) contributing to over 100,000 deaths annually in the United States. Accurate risk stratification for in-hospital mortality is essential for guiding clinical decisions, improving outcomes, and optimizing hospital resources. However, existing models often rely on limited predictor sets, outdated data, and linear methods that may not reflect current clinical practice or complex interactions. ObjectiveTo develop and validate a contemporary in-hospital mortality risk model for AMI patients using modern statistical and machine learning approaches, incorporating clinical, demographic, and social determinants of health. MethodsWe utilized data from the American Heart Association (AHA) Get with The Guidelines(R)- Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) Registry. Patients with AMI admitted between October 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022 (201,191 patients from 605 hospitals) were used to develop the in-hospital mortality prediction model. An independent validation cohort included 70,302 patients admitted in 2023. We incorporated 27 predictors, including demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory values, and social determinants of health. We assessed the models including a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) and machine learning algorithms. We benchmarked against the legacy ACTION Registry-GWTG model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed model performance across sex, race/ethnicity, STEMI status, and time period. ResultsThe LightGBM-based GWTG-CAD model achieved the highest discrimination (AUROC 0.874, 95% CI: 0.867-0.880) and demonstrated excellent calibration across all subgroups. Both GLMM and LightGBM outperformed the ACTION Registry-GWTG model, with LightGBM showing the most consistent performance in the 2023 validation cohort. Beyond traditional predictors, the inclusion of comorbidities, transportation methods, and community-level socioeconomic factors added predictive value. ConclusionThe new GWTG-CAD risk model incorporates clinical, pre-hospital, and social factor predictors, along with machine learning methods, to enhance prediction of mortality in contemporary AMI patients.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 94%
- Effectiveness of an Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 94%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 96%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 95%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 93%
- National Trends and Disparities in Hospitalization for Hypertensive Emergencies Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999–2019 93%
- High-sensitivity cardiac troponin on presentation to rule out myocardial infarction: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 95%
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 93%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock 96%
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 94%
- Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.