Back

Development, calibration, and external validation of a semi-Markov model for hypertension in older adults with Medicare coverage in the United States

Acharya, M.; Hayes, C. J.; Bogulski, C. A.; Ali, M. M.; Wolde, F.; Eswaran, H.

2025-07-03 health economics
10.1101/2025.07.02.25330766 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo develop a semi-Markov model of hypertension specifically using estimates from primary analysis of Medicare data, and calibrate and validate using external trial and observational data. MethodsA semi-Markov model of hypertension with ten disease states was developed using clinical expertise and literature review: hypertension, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), other cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic CVD, early-stage chronic kidney disease (ES CKD), late-stage CKD (LS CKD), and death. Most transition probabilities and hazard ratios for excess mortality were obtained from analysis of Medicare data (2018-2021). Transition probabilities and hazard ratios were calibrated against findings from the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) trial and post-trial follow-up studies. Iterative grid search using Latin Hypercube Sampling was used for calibration, followed by a recalibration using Nelder-Mead simplex method with common random numbers. External validation was performed using mortality data after MI and stroke. ResultsFinal monthly transition probabilities from hypertension to other states were: other CVD (0.026), ES CKD (0.010), CHF (0.004), stroke (0.004), TIA (0.002), and MI (0.002). Final hazard ratios were: MI (3.29), CHF (3.99), stroke (3.79), TIA (1.39), other CVD (3.84), chronic CVD (1.39), ES CKD (1.24), and LS CKD (4.16). In the external validation, mortality rates per 100 person-years among stroke survivors were 7.8 (modeled) and 8.2 (observed). ConclusionOur model was reasonably calibrated except for CHF incidence and stroke-related mortality. External validation showed the model performed well over longer timeframe, but discrepancies were observed for shorter periods.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.