Selection inference in a complex genomic landscape: the role of inversions in the spruce bark beetle
Morales-Garcia, J.; Babik, W.; Zielinski, P.; Nadachowska-Brzyska, K.
Show abstract
Understanding the genetic basis of adaptation is a key objective in evolutionary biology. Although advances in genomic selection scans have greatly improved our ability to detect signatures of adaptation, distinguishing true signals from false positives remains challenging. This task is particularly difficult in regions of reduced recombination, such as polymorphic inversions. In this study, we examine the genome-wide landscape of selection in the European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus), Europes most destructive forest pest, which has one of the most complex inversion-associated recombination landscapes known. Using simulation-based analyses and whole-genome resequencing data from 312 individuals across 23 populations, we applied two complementary selection scan methods (nSL and {Lambda}) to assess how inversions influence the detection of adaptive signals. Simulations revealed that the two selection scan methods differ in their susceptibility to false-positive signals within inversions and that partitioning data by inversion genotype (i.e., homozygote classes) can substantially reduce these errors. Consistent with the results of our simulations, our empirical data showed that inversions are highly enriched for selection signals when all inversion genotypes are analyzed but are depleted when only homozygotes are considered. This demonstrates that focusing on homozygote genotypes allows for a more precise identification of putative selection targets and haplotype-specific signals, as it overcomes the confounding effects of suppressed recombination in heterokaryotypic individuals. In contrast, the detection of selection in collinear regions was largely unaffected by the presence of inversions. Our findings highlight that inversions may play an important role in shaping adaptation, underscoring the need to account for species-specific genomic architecture when interpreting signals from selection scans. Author summaryDetecting the genetic basis of adaptation is one of the main goals in evolutionary biology. However, it is often difficult to tell whether selection signals identified by genome scans truly reflect natural selection signatures or are simply artefacts of genome structure. In this study, we examined how polymorphic inversions affect the detection of selection in the European spruce bark beetle, one of Europes most destructive forest pests. First, we assessed two selection scan methods using simulation approach. Second, we tested the influence of polymorphic inversion on the selection inference using genome-wide data from 23 beetle populations. We showed that inversions can create false signals of selection when all individuals are analyzed together but by separating individuals according to their inversion genotypes, we were able to distinguish potential adaptive regions from false positives. Our results demonstrate that accounting for genomic architecture is crucial for identifying selection signatures and provide practical guidelines for studying species with inversion-rich genomes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Selection on the fly: short term adaptation to an altered sexual selection regime in Drosophila pseudoobscura 95%
- Improved reference genome uncovers novel sex-linked regions in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) 94%
- Chromosomal inversions and the demography of speciation in Drosophila montana and Drosophila flavomontana 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nascent evolution of recombination rate differences as a consequence of chromosomal rearrangements 95%
- Disentangling the determinants of transposable elements dynamics in vertebrate genomes using empirical evidences and simulations 94%
- The fourspine stickleback (Apeltes quadracus) has an XY sex chromosome system with polymorphic inversions on both X and Y chromosomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.