Natural Language Processing for assessing multimorbidity: A systematic review
Shankar, R.; Goh, Z.; Xu, Q.
Show abstract
BackgroundMultimorbidity poses significant healthcare challenges globally. Current assessment methods rely primarily on structured electronic health record (EHR) data, potentially missing valuable information contained in unstructured clinical notes. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques offer promising solutions for extracting comprehensive multimorbidity data from these unstructured sources. ObjectivesTo identify, characterize, and critically appraise studies utilizing NLP techniques for multimorbidity assessment from unstructured EHR data. MethodsThis systematic review will follow PRISMA-P guidelines and be conducted according to Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute methodologies. We will search multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus) from inception to February 2025. Eligible studies will include adult populations with multimorbidity ([≥]2 chronic conditions) where NLP techniques were applied to unstructured EHR data and compared against reference standards. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data, and assess methodological quality using PROBAST, CLAIM, TRIPOD, and QUADAS-2 tools as appropriate. Both quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) and narrative synthesis will be considered based on study heterogeneity. OutcomesPrimary outcomes include validity metrics of NLP-based multimorbidity assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, F1 score, AUROC). Secondary outcomes include reliability measures, generalizability assessments, efficiency metrics, and end-user perspectives. DiscussionThis review will establish the current state of evidence on NLP for multimorbidity assessment, identify best practices and challenges, and guide future research efforts in this emerging field. Findings will inform the development and implementation of improved methods for extracting multimorbidity information from unstructured clinical text, potentially enhancing risk stratification, care planning, and research for patients with multiple chronic conditions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 92%
- Protocol for Development of a Reporting Guideline for Causal and Counterfactual Prediction Models 92%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review 92%
- Using telehealth consultations for healthcare provision to patients from racial/ethnic minorities: A systematic review 92%
- Beyond Metrics to Methods: A Scoping Review of Large Language Models for Detection of Social Drivers of Health in Clinical Notes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 93%
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 92%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: A systematic review 92%
- Quantitative bias analysis for mismeasured variables in health research: a review of software tools 92%
- Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 90%
- A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial of guided self-help Behavioral Activation intervention for geriatric depression 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.