Back

Natural Language Processing for assessing multimorbidity: A systematic review

Shankar, R.; Goh, Z.; Xu, Q.

2025-07-01 health informatics
10.1101/2025.06.30.25330608 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMultimorbidity poses significant healthcare challenges globally. Current assessment methods rely primarily on structured electronic health record (EHR) data, potentially missing valuable information contained in unstructured clinical notes. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques offer promising solutions for extracting comprehensive multimorbidity data from these unstructured sources. ObjectivesTo identify, characterize, and critically appraise studies utilizing NLP techniques for multimorbidity assessment from unstructured EHR data. MethodsThis systematic review will follow PRISMA-P guidelines and be conducted according to Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute methodologies. We will search multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus) from inception to February 2025. Eligible studies will include adult populations with multimorbidity ([≥]2 chronic conditions) where NLP techniques were applied to unstructured EHR data and compared against reference standards. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data, and assess methodological quality using PROBAST, CLAIM, TRIPOD, and QUADAS-2 tools as appropriate. Both quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) and narrative synthesis will be considered based on study heterogeneity. OutcomesPrimary outcomes include validity metrics of NLP-based multimorbidity assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, F1 score, AUROC). Secondary outcomes include reliability measures, generalizability assessments, efficiency metrics, and end-user perspectives. DiscussionThis review will establish the current state of evidence on NLP for multimorbidity assessment, identify best practices and challenges, and guide future research efforts in this emerging field. Findings will inform the development and implementation of improved methods for extracting multimorbidity information from unstructured clinical text, potentially enhancing risk stratification, care planning, and research for patients with multiple chronic conditions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.