Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review
Vinay, R.; Ferrario, A.; Gloeckler, S.; Biller-Andorno, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) and advance directives (AD) are tools for supporting person-centered decision-making. In dementia care, the progression of cognitive decline, complex family dynamics and variability in healthcare systems pose unique challenges to effective ACP/AD implementation for people with dementia (PWD). MethodsWe conducted a scoping review of the literature related to ACP/AD in dementia care between 2014-2024. Studies were screened and thematically analyzed to identify current approaches, gaps and recommendations for dementia-specific ACP/AD. We identified key stakeholders involved in decision-making and highlighted procedural components for ACP/AD according to stakeholder groups. ResultsForty studies were included. Key stakeholders included healthcare professionals (HCPs); family members and caregivers; PWD; dyads (PWD and their caregivers); the broader public; policymakers; and researchers. Prominent findings included: the role and training of HCPs; educational and decision-support needs; early and ongoing engagement of PWD; development and evaluation of dementia-specific tools; ethical and procedural challenges in end-of-life decision-making; and the importance of outreach and cultural sensitivity. Promising interventions include structured communication models, psychoeducational programs and tools, although few have been fully adapted for dementia. ConclusionDementia-specific ACP/AD require a relational, flexible and ethically grounded approach that evolves with the individuals condition. While ACP/AD should reflect the autonomous preferences of the PWD, during late-stage dementia, shared decision-making becomes central to providing care that aligns with the persons goals and preferences. Future research should focus on inclusive tools and training; timing and process facilitation; and public health strategies to improve access and equity.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Large household reduces dementia mortality 94%
- Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis 94%
- Patterns of long-term care utilization during the last five years of life among Swedish older adults with and without dementia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Considerations regarding a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease before dementia: a systematic review 96%
- High occurrence of transportation and logistics occupations among vascular dementia patients: an observational study 90%
- Machine learning applications in vascular neuroimaging for the diagnosis and prognosis of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the GRACE voice assistant for dementia care among caregivers and healthcare professionals: An interview study. 95%
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 88%
- User Experience Evaluation of Cogscreen for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment: Formative and Summative Evaluation 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review of the impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia 93%
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 91%
- Informal caregiving following stroke: a qualitative exploration of carer self-identification, care-related language and support experiences 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.