Back

Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review

Vinay, R.; Ferrario, A.; Gloeckler, S.; Biller-Andorno, N.

2025-06-30 medical ethics
10.1101/2025.06.30.25330415 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) and advance directives (AD) are tools for supporting person-centered decision-making. In dementia care, the progression of cognitive decline, complex family dynamics and variability in healthcare systems pose unique challenges to effective ACP/AD implementation for people with dementia (PWD). MethodsWe conducted a scoping review of the literature related to ACP/AD in dementia care between 2014-2024. Studies were screened and thematically analyzed to identify current approaches, gaps and recommendations for dementia-specific ACP/AD. We identified key stakeholders involved in decision-making and highlighted procedural components for ACP/AD according to stakeholder groups. ResultsForty studies were included. Key stakeholders included healthcare professionals (HCPs); family members and caregivers; PWD; dyads (PWD and their caregivers); the broader public; policymakers; and researchers. Prominent findings included: the role and training of HCPs; educational and decision-support needs; early and ongoing engagement of PWD; development and evaluation of dementia-specific tools; ethical and procedural challenges in end-of-life decision-making; and the importance of outreach and cultural sensitivity. Promising interventions include structured communication models, psychoeducational programs and tools, although few have been fully adapted for dementia. ConclusionDementia-specific ACP/AD require a relational, flexible and ethically grounded approach that evolves with the individuals condition. While ACP/AD should reflect the autonomous preferences of the PWD, during late-stage dementia, shared decision-making becomes central to providing care that aligns with the persons goals and preferences. Future research should focus on inclusive tools and training; timing and process facilitation; and public health strategies to improve access and equity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
3
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
5
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
10
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
14
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
15
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%