NANOME: A Nextflow pipeline for haplotype-aware allele-specific consensus DNA methylation detection by nanopore long-read sequencing
Liu, Y.; Taha, H. B.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, Z.; Chatzipantsiou, C.; Wade, E.; Slocum, T.; Karuturi, L.; Zhao, Y.; Karmakar, S.; Li, S.
Show abstract
Nanopore long-read sequencing has expanded the capacity of long-range, single-base, and single-molecule DNA-methylation (DNAme) detection and haplotype-aware allele-specific epigenetic phasing. Previously, we benchmarked and ranked the robustness of seven computational tools for DNAme detection using nanopore sequencing. The top performers were Megalodon, Nanopolish, DeepSignal and Guppy. However, these algorithms exhibit lower performance at regions with discordant non-singleton DNAme patterns compared to genome-wide regions. Furthermore, long-read sequencing analysis of mammalian genomes requires higher computational resources than next-generation sequencing. To address these issues, we developed a NANOpore Methylation (NANOME) a consensus DNAme predictive model using XGBoost, which integrates the output of Megalodon, Nanopolish, and Deepsignal for analyzing data obtained using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). NANOME enhanced DNAme detection precision (mean square error) at single-base resolution by 11% and improved accuracy (F1-score) at single-molecule resolution by 2.4% for human B-lymphocyte European cell lines (NA12878). The consensus model also detected [~]200,000 more CpGs than all three tools. Combing variant calling and long-read phasing, NANOME can detect haplotype-aware allele-specific DNAme in known imprinting controls in resolved and previously unresolved regions. We conducted haplotype-aware methylation detection on the T2T genome for dataset NA12878, revealing significant variations in differentially methylated region (DMR) density between gap and non-gap regions. Overall, NANOME represents a significant step forward in DNAme detection and long-range epigenetic phasing, offering a robust and accessible tool for researchers studying the epigenome.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepMP: a deep learning tool to detect DNA base modifications on Nanopore sequencing data 97%
- diffONT: predicting methylation-specific PCR biomarkers based on nanopore sequencing data for clinical application 96%
- GCfix: A Fast and Accurate Fragment Length-SpecificMethod for Correcting GC Bias in Cell-Free DNA 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rockfish: A Transformer-based Model for Accurate 5-Methylcytosine Prediction from Nanopore Sequencing 97%
- MethylBERT: A Transformer-based model for read-level DNA methylation pattern identification and tumour deconvolution 96%
- Systematic benchmarking of tools for CpG methylation detection from Nanopore sequencing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Haplotype-aware variant calling enables high accuracy in nanopore long-reads using deep neural networks 95%
- Uncalled4 improves nanopore DNA and RNA modification detection via fast and accurate signal alignment 95%
- Simultaneous profiling of chromatin accessibility and methylation on human cell lines with nanopore sequencing 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.