DEFINE(prehospital): A protocol for a qualitative interview study to determine the pathway and response to the inclusion of frailty in pre-hospital trauma triage tools
Braude, P.; Kirby, K.; Bedson, A.; Nicholson, H.; Black, S.; Carlton, E.; Benger, J.
Show abstract
At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic South Western Ambulance Service Foundation Trust (SWASFT) changed its pre-hospital trauma triage tool to include an assessment of frailty, and if scored 5 or more on the Clinical Frailty Scale, the tool instructed the person to be conveyed to a trauma unit and not the major trauma centre. How the use of frailty has been operationalised and effected in daily clinical practice is unknown. There were concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic that care was being rationed by a frailty score alone, without expert oversight or appropriate training. Whether or not care rationing was appropriate at the height of the pandemic remains a philosophical question, however more research is needed into using the CFS for this type of decision making. This is relevant to using frailty scores in trauma triage tools outside of a pandemic situation, particularly when a score may prompt a change in clinical management. This study aims to explore the pathways of care that have been associated with this incorporation of frailty. In addition, it will aim to explore healthcare professionals experience of frailty scoring for trauma patients pre-hospital and at the receiving hospitals.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 96%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 96%
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 95%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 93%
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 93%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Why is implementing remote monitoring in virtual wards (Hospital at Home) for people living with frailty so hard? Qualitative interview study 94%
- Preventable deaths involving falls in England and Wales, 2013-2022: a systematic case series of coroners’ reports 93%
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Adjusted Mortality Risk in Care Homes for Older Adults in Wales, United Kingdom: A retrospective population-based cohort study for mortality in 2016-2020 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study 92%
- Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review and critical appraisal 92%
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.