Back

XtractPAV: An Automated Pipeline for Identifying Presence-Absence Variations Across Multiple Genomes

Ahmad, R. S.; Sadaqat, M.; Tahir ul Qamar, M.

2025-07-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.27.661953 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationPresence-absence variations (PAVs) significantly influence phenotypic diversity across and within species by modulating functional modules involved in stress responsiveness, adaptation, and developmental processes. This modulation ultimately contributes to genetic diversity at both inter- and intra-species levels. However, existing tools for detecting PAVs offer limitations in achieving optimal analysis because they lack scalable workflows for multi-genome comparisons and frequently necessitate manual integration. To address these challenges, we developed XtractPAV, an end-to-end pipeline that automates the extraction, annotation, and interactive visualization of PAVs across large-scale genomic datasets. ResultsXtractPAV was evaluated using assembled genomes of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms, including Pyrus communis, Arabidopsis thaliana, Mus musculus, and Salmonella enterica, to assess its ability to detect the genomic variations across diverse species. The performance of XtractPAV was benchmarked against other established pipelines, demonstrating superior precision and a more comprehensive extraction of PAV segments. Notably, our pipeline not only identified the known PAVs from the reference set but also revealed novel variations in genes associated with various functions such as flowering time regulation and disease resistance. Furthermore, the automated report generation feature of XtractPAV produces publication-ready summaries of PAV distributions and related metrics. AvailabilityXtractPAV is freely accessible at https://github.com/SherazAhmadd/XtractPAV and on the XtractPAV webpage. The Package includes all requisite files, a user manual, test data, and a license permitting non-commercial use. Supplementary materialSupplementary data are accessible online at Bioinformatics.

Published in BMC Genomics (predicted rank #7) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.