Back

Considerations for healthcare wastewater surveillance of targeted antimicrobial-resistant organisms

Coulliette-Salmond, A. A.; Whitehill, F. A.; Lyons, A. A.; Abera, B.; Adler, C.; Walters, M. A.; Medrzycki, M. A.; Ganim Kyros, C. A.; Campbell, M.; Lin, M. Y.-W.; Poretsky, R. Y.-W.; Horton, A.; Weidhaas, J.; VanDerslice, J.; Benson, S.; Driver, E.; Halden, R. U.; Hamilton, K.; Williams, M. A.

2025-06-28 public and global health
10.1101/2025.06.27.25330422 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractWastewater surveillance (WWS) at healthcare facilities paired with CDC- recommended patient screening methods may enable earlier detection of targeted antimicrobial resistant (AR) pathogens. However, this is a nascent field with knowledge gaps for how to best evaluate, implement, and interpret healthcare facility WWS. AR pathogens, such as carbapenemase-producing organisms and C. auris, are important non-viral targets in long-term acute care hospitals and ventilator-capable skilled nursing facilities (SNF) affecting high-risk, high-acuity patients and residents, respectively. To address the knowledge gaps, healthcare facility WWS was piloted at three Georgia SNFs (6 months per facility, weekly sampling), including obtaining permissions from health departments and facility administrators, conducting tracer studies to confirm effluent source, and evaluating sample collection approaches to manage low-flow and flushed healthcare debris. Additionally, a wastewater access survey was piloted in five states at 16 post-acute/long-term care facilities to assess feasibility of WWS regarding physical on-site manhole access, safety aspects, effluent flow, and other factors; 75% (12 of 16) of surveyed facilities demonstrated feasibility. Our findings suggest the importance of conducting thorough wastewater assay validation, assessing state public health lab capacity, as well as including paired wastewater samples with facility screenings in real-time to interpret the WWS results and understand the correlations with AR presence/prevalence among the facility population. Presented lessons learned and considerations are intended for stakeholders to review before implementing healthcare facility-level WWS for the purpose of AR organism public health surveillance to achieve the intended public health impact.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.