Considerations for healthcare wastewater surveillance of targeted antimicrobial-resistant organisms
Coulliette-Salmond, A. A.; Whitehill, F. A.; Lyons, A. A.; Abera, B.; Adler, C.; Walters, M. A.; Medrzycki, M. A.; Ganim Kyros, C. A.; Campbell, M.; Lin, M. Y.-W.; Poretsky, R. Y.-W.; Horton, A.; Weidhaas, J.; VanDerslice, J.; Benson, S.; Driver, E.; Halden, R. U.; Hamilton, K.; Williams, M. A.
Show abstract
AbstractWastewater surveillance (WWS) at healthcare facilities paired with CDC- recommended patient screening methods may enable earlier detection of targeted antimicrobial resistant (AR) pathogens. However, this is a nascent field with knowledge gaps for how to best evaluate, implement, and interpret healthcare facility WWS. AR pathogens, such as carbapenemase-producing organisms and C. auris, are important non-viral targets in long-term acute care hospitals and ventilator-capable skilled nursing facilities (SNF) affecting high-risk, high-acuity patients and residents, respectively. To address the knowledge gaps, healthcare facility WWS was piloted at three Georgia SNFs (6 months per facility, weekly sampling), including obtaining permissions from health departments and facility administrators, conducting tracer studies to confirm effluent source, and evaluating sample collection approaches to manage low-flow and flushed healthcare debris. Additionally, a wastewater access survey was piloted in five states at 16 post-acute/long-term care facilities to assess feasibility of WWS regarding physical on-site manhole access, safety aspects, effluent flow, and other factors; 75% (12 of 16) of surveyed facilities demonstrated feasibility. Our findings suggest the importance of conducting thorough wastewater assay validation, assessing state public health lab capacity, as well as including paired wastewater samples with facility screenings in real-time to interpret the WWS results and understand the correlations with AR presence/prevalence among the facility population. Presented lessons learned and considerations are intended for stakeholders to review before implementing healthcare facility-level WWS for the purpose of AR organism public health surveillance to achieve the intended public health impact.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in school populations: a wastewater-based approach 96%
- Detection of SARS-Coronavirus-2 in wastewater, using the existing environmental surveillance network: An epidemiological gateway to an early warning for COVID-19 in communities. 95%
- Wastewater surveillance in smaller college communities may aid future public health initiatives 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Public awareness and support for use of wastewater for SARS-CoV-2 monitoring: A community survey in Louisville, Kentucky 97%
- Nationwide trends in COVID-19 cases and SARS-CoV-2 wastewater concentrations in the United States 96%
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Point-of-Entry UV Treatment for Cistern Water Among Households in the US Virgin Islands 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Academic institution extensive, building-by-building wastewater-based surveillance platform for SARS-CoV-2 monitoring, clinical data correlation, and potential national proxy 95%
- City-wide Built Environment SARS-CoV-2 Detection for COVID-19 Surveillance 95%
- Using geographic information systems to link population estimates to wastewater surveillance data in New York State, USA 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater during New York City’s second wave of COVID-19: Sewershed-level trends and relationships to publicly available clinical testing data 97%
- Respiratory human adenovirus outbreak captured in wastewater surveillance 96%
- Meta-analyses on SARS-CoV-2 Viral Titers in Wastewater and Their Correlations to Epidemiological Indicators 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.