Back

Diatoms vs dinoflagellates: a temporal network analysis of bloom impacts on diversity and phytoplankton community structure in French coastal waters

Dias, J.-Y.; Pochic, V.; Chaffron, S.; Gernez, P.

2025-06-30 ecology
10.1101/2025.06.26.661744 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding phytoplankton community responses to bloom events is essential as these have major implications for biogeochemical cycles, marine food webs, but can also be harmful to ecosystems, the economy, and public health. Diatoms and dinoflagellates are the two most common bloom-forming classes, with distinct ecologies and bloom dynamics. Using time series from a long-term phytoplankton monitoring survey (REPHY) of French coastal waters analysed with ecological association networks and diversity metrics, we investigated how blooms of diatoms and dinoflagellates affect diversity and community structure within phytoplankton communities. We highlight distinct responses: an increase in species richness during diatom blooms and a decrease during dinoflagellate blooms. However, both bloom types resulted in a decrease in alpha diversity indices. Temporal association networks modularity and association strength were also differently impacted between both bloom types. However, high-level association types and composition in association networks remain stable, suggesting an important role of their proportions in ecosystem functioning and resilience. We propose several hypotheses for these findings based on known ecological and biological processes, that remain to be tested individually in dedicated studies. Our work underlines the importance of distinguishing the different types of blooms and studying the role of interactions between phytoplankton for a better understanding of their dynamics.

Published in ISME Communications (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.