Navigating the Lipid Universe with LipidLibrarian: A Cross-Linked Database for Lipidomics Data Integration
Niedermaier, F.; Mechteridis, K.; Pelz, K.; Wuerf, V.; Koehler, N.; Pauling, J. K.
Show abstract
There are numerous public resources and guidelines available for lipidomics research, including standard nomenclatures, classification systems, and lipid databases. However, these resources are not always aligned with one another, making it difficult to find and compare information on the same lipid across different databases. To tackle these challenges we present LipidLibrarian, a lipid search engine that enables a combined search of all major lipid databases by aggregating the available information and presenting it in a unified manner. The three main sources of information that build the foundation of LipidLibrarian as a comprehensive search-engine are SwissLipids, LIPID MAPS and ALEX123. Furthermore, various secondary resources such as LION/web, LINEX, LipidLynxX, and Goslin were incorporated to enhance the results and conduct name and hierarchy conversions. LipidLibrarian is accessible via a user-friendly website, allowing the user to query lipids using their trivial names, shorthand notations, database identifiers, or their masses. Alternatively, LipidLibrarian can be accessed as a Python package for integration into high-throughput lipidomics pipelines. The output of a LipidLibrarian query is split into multiple categories, such as nomenclature, database identifiers, masses, adducts, fragments, ontology terms, and reactions. For each of these categories, LipidLi-brarian aggregates the results from all databases and provides the source from which each value originates. This enables the user to quickly assess if the databases contain differing or conflicting information. In summary, LipidLibrarian provides an effortless, comprehensive and automated search for lipid information, thereby accelerating the research workflow and making it a meaningful tool for the scientific community.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MESSES: Software for Transforming Messy Research Datasets into Clean Submissions to Metabolomics Workbench for Public Sharing 96%
- Major Update and Improved Validation Functionality in the mwtab Python Library and the Metabolomics Workbench File Status Website 96%
- MetaFetcheR: An R package for complete mapping of small compound data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Flame (v2.0): advanced integration and interpretation of functional enrichment results from multiple sources 95%
- Pathway Volcano: An interactive tool for pathway guided visualization of differential expression data 94%
- massDatabase: utilities for the operation of the public compound and pathway database 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- mzMLb: a future-proof raw mass spectrometry data format based on standards-compliant mzML and optimized for speed and storage requirements 95%
- Fast and memory efficient searching of large-scale mass spectrometry data using Tide 95%
- PELSA-Decipher: a software tool for the processing and interpretation of ligand protein interaction dataset acquired by PELSA 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- GraphOmics: an Interactive Platform to Explore and Integrate Multi-Omics Data 94%
- PDAUG - a Galaxy based toolset for peptide library analysis, visualization, and machine learning modeling 94%
- Fast alignment of mass spectra in large proteomics datasets, capturing dissimilarities arising from multiple complex modifications of peptides 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- ODAMNet: a Python package to identify molecular relationships between chemicals and rare diseases using overlap, active module and random walk approaches 95%
- Slitflow: a Python framework for single-molecule dynamics and localization analysis 94%
- PeptideMind: applying machine learning algorithms to assess replicate quality in shotgun proteomic data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.