Back

Sex differences in placebo and antidepressant response to intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: a pooled participant analysis of randomized controlled trials

Huc, M.; Siddiqi, S.; Myers, M.; Colman, I.; Salmaso, N.; Jaworska, N.; Aguilar-Valles, A.

2025-06-28 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2025.06.26.25330356
Show abstract

BackgroundRacemic ketamine and its enantiomer, esketamine, have emerged as fast-acting antidepressant options for individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Yet, despite growing clinical use, little is known about how sex assigned at birth shapes symptom-specific responses to these interventions, a critical gap in the move toward personalized psychiatry. MethodsWe conducted a pooled analysis of five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in which adults with TRD received intranasal esketamine or placebo twice weekly for four weeks, alongside a newly initiated oral antidepressant. We evaluated the effects of sex assigned at birth on overall depression severity, measured via total Montgomery-[A]sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, and across four symptom factors: sadness, negative thoughts, detachment, and neurovegetative symptoms. Rates of clinical response and remission were also analyzed by sex assigned at birth. FindingsOverall, esketamine treatment improved total MADRS scores in both sexes; however, significant sex-specific patterns emerged. Females showed greater improvement in total MADRS scores than males towards the end of the trials, in both the placebo and esketamine arms. Females also showed more pronounced reductions in the sadness and detachment factors at the end of the trials, as well as in the neurovegetative factor on day 15, regardless of the treatment group. On the other hand, males showed a significant reduction in sadness symptoms after esketamine on day 2 of the treatment. Females had higher odds of responding, regardless of treatment arm, during later time points. InterpretationThese findings reveal that sex assigned at birth influences overall antidepressant response and shapes the trajectory and symptom profile of improvement. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of incorporating sex assigned at birth as a key variable, essential for optimizing TRD treatment strategies and advancing individualized mental healthcare. FundingCanadian Institutes for Health Research.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 0.7%
13.4%
2
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
based on 19 papers
Top 0.2%
12.7%
3
European Neuropsychopharmacology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
Neuropsychopharmacology
based on 29 papers
Top 0.2%
7.7%
5
The British Journal of Psychiatry
based on 21 papers
Top 0.4%
6.5%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
5.1%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 0.7%
4.8%
9
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 79%
2.8%
10
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 0.7%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 59%
2.6%
12
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 5%
2.5%
13
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
based on 23 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
based on 35 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Biological Psychiatry
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Sleep Research
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
18
New England Journal of Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
20
JAMA Psychiatry
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
21
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 25%
0.7%
22
Psychiatry Research
based on 33 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 19%
0.7%
25
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 7%
0.7%