Back

Sex differences in placebo and antidepressant response to intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: a pooled participant analysis of randomized controlled trials

Huc, M.; Siddiqi, S.; Myers, M.; Colman, I.; Salmaso, N.; Jaworska, N.; Aguilar-Valles, A.

2025-06-28 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2025.06.26.25330356 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRacemic ketamine and its enantiomer, esketamine, have emerged as fast-acting antidepressant options for individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Yet, despite growing clinical use, little is known about how sex assigned at birth shapes symptom-specific responses to these interventions, a critical gap in the move toward personalized psychiatry. MethodsWe conducted a pooled analysis of five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in which adults with TRD received intranasal esketamine or placebo twice weekly for four weeks, alongside a newly initiated oral antidepressant. We evaluated the effects of sex assigned at birth on overall depression severity, measured via total Montgomery-[A]sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, and across four symptom factors: sadness, negative thoughts, detachment, and neurovegetative symptoms. Rates of clinical response and remission were also analyzed by sex assigned at birth. FindingsOverall, esketamine treatment improved total MADRS scores in both sexes; however, significant sex-specific patterns emerged. Females showed greater improvement in total MADRS scores than males towards the end of the trials, in both the placebo and esketamine arms. Females also showed more pronounced reductions in the sadness and detachment factors at the end of the trials, as well as in the neurovegetative factor on day 15, regardless of the treatment group. On the other hand, males showed a significant reduction in sadness symptoms after esketamine on day 2 of the treatment. Females had higher odds of responding, regardless of treatment arm, during later time points. InterpretationThese findings reveal that sex assigned at birth influences overall antidepressant response and shapes the trajectory and symptom profile of improvement. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of incorporating sex assigned at birth as a key variable, essential for optimizing TRD treatment strategies and advancing individualized mental healthcare. FundingCanadian Institutes for Health Research.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
5
European Neuropsychopharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
7
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
14
JAMA Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
20
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Journal of Psychopharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%