Back

HQCM-EBTC: A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Model for Explainable Brain Tumor Classification

AIT HADDOU, M.; Bennai, M.

2025-06-27 health informatics
10.1101/2025.06.26.25330353 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of a hybrid quantum-classical model, denoted as HQCM-EBTC, for the automated classification of brain tumors, comparing its performance against a classical counterpart. A comprehensive dataset comprising 7,576 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, encompassing normal brain structures, meningioma, glioma, and pituitary tumors, was employed. The HQCM-EBTC model integrates a quantum processing layer with 5 qubits per circuit, a circuit depth of 2, and 5 parallel circuits, trained via the AdamW optimizer with a composite loss function that combines cross-entropy and attention consistency losses. The results demonstrate that HQCM-EBTC significantly outperforms the classical model, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 96.48% compared to 86.72%. The quantumenhanced model exhibits superior precision, recall, and F1-scores across all tumor classes, particularly in glioma classification. t-SNE visualizations reveal enhanced feature separability within the quantum processing layer, leading to more distinct decision boundaries. Confusion matrix analysis further substantiates a reduction in misclassification rates with HQCM-EBTC. Moreover, attention map analysis, quantified using the Jaccard Index, indicates that HQCM-EBTC produces more localized and accurate tumor region activations, especially at higher confidence thresholds. These findings underscore the potential of quantum-enhanced models to improve brain tumor classification accuracy and localization, offering promising advancements for clinical diagnostic applications. The demonstrated ability of HQCM-EBTC to achieve higher accuracy and more precise tumor localization suggests a significant step forward in applying quantum computing to medical imaging analysis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.