Operationalization of Cochrane's risk of bias 2 tool (RoB 2) in the context of psychotherapy trials
Miguel, C.; Harrer, M.; Karyotaki, E.; Sahker, E.; Sakata, M.; Furukawa, T.; Cuijpers, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundEvaluating risk of bias (RoB) is a crucial step in systematic reviews and meta-analyses to ensure trustworthy evidence. Cochranes RoB 2 tool is the most widely used approach for assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials. However, its application can be challenging, particularly in fields like psychotherapy, where standard trial procedures such as double blinding are often unfeasible. ObjectiveThis article presents a context-specific operationalization and implementation guideline for applying RoB 2 to psychotherapy trials, addressing common challenges and ambiguities in this field. MethodThis guideline was developed based on empirical evidence, an expert consensus process, and iterative piloting. It provides a structured interpretation of all RoB 2 domains and signalling questions, adapted to the common methodological features of psychotherapy trials. ResultsThe operationalization resulted in 24 standardized RoB items with a harmonized scoring logic, accompanied by a practical handbook offering domainspecific advice and examples relevant to psychotherapy research. To support its use, two open-access digital assistant tools (web-based and spreadsheet formats) were developed to guide users through the rating process and facilitate integration with systematic review workflows (metapsy.org/rob). ConclusionThis guidance offers a practical approach for applying RoB 2 in psychotherapy outcome research. It is intended to be used alongside the Cochrane manual and may help improve the transparency and reproducibility of RoB 2 assessments for psychotherapy trials.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with evidence-based psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of optimal implementation parameters 90%
- From Feasibility to Utility: A Meta-Analysis of Amygdala-Neurofeedback 89%
- From smartphone data to clinically relevant predictions: A systematic review of digital phenotyping methods in depression 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 94%
- Systematic Review Protocol: The Effects of Theory-Based Interventions for Self-Help Practices in the Management of Mild to Moderate Depression 93%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 91%
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 89%
- To Include or Not to Include? A prescription from the pharmacy on how to use active learning assisted screening in systematic reviews 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
- Relapse prevention through health technology program reduces hospitalization in schizophrenia 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 88%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 88%
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.