Back

Asymmetrical Frontal-Subcortical Aberrance in ADHD: Empirical Support of a Developmental Network Model

Lee, T.-W.

2025-06-26 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.06.25.25330293 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study empirically tests a theoretical model of ADHD that identifies aberrant frontal-to-subcortical projections--particularly those involving the ventral tegmental area and, consequently, the nucleus accumbens (NAc)--as a core neurobiological vulnerability. The model predicts reduced frontal influence on subcortical structures and group-by-direction interaction effects, especially at the NAc. MethodsStructural and resting-state fMRI data from sixty individuals with ADHD and sixty healthy controls were selected from the ADHD-200 dataset. The cortex was parcellated using MOSI (Modular Analysis and Similarity Measurements). The mean amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and the mean time series were extracted for each frontal node. Subcortical nuclei--including the caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, NAc, and thalamus--were included in the analyses, with each voxel treated as a neural node. Correlation analyses were performed to examine the relationship between nodal power (ALFF) and nodal degree. Directional metrics were defined as frontal-to-subcortical (F2S) and subcortical-to-frontal (S2F) correlations between nodal strength and nodal power. Group differences and interactions were tested using t-tests and linear mixed-effects (LME) models. ResultsCorrelation and LME analyses revealed a consistent bimodal pattern, with positive F2S and negative S2F associations across all subcortical nuclei, suggesting a directional excitation-inhibition balance. Reduced F2S slopes in ADHD and a significant group-by-direction interaction in the NAc (p = 0.009) supported model predictions. ConclusionsThe proposed developmental model of ADHD was empirically supported.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.3%
2
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
4
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
10
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
11
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
13
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
14
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
15
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%