Back

Distribution of cardiovascular disease risk based on the updated 2023 guideline-recommended Australian cardiovascular disease risk algorithm and comparison with the 2012 algorithm

Lazarevic, N.; Bhat, M.; Joshy, G.; Butler, D.; Woodward, M.; Patel, A.; Jackson, R.; Jennings, G.; Wyber, R.; Paige, E.; Banks, E.

2025-06-26 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.06.25.25330097 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAustralian guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management, including risk prediction algorithms, were updated in 2023. We quantified CVD risk using the 2023 algorithm, compared this to the previous 2012 algorithm, and considered implications for preventive pharmacotherapy. DesignComparative analysis. Setting, participantsData from 115,873 people aged 45-74 years without existing CVD from MedicineInsight, a longitudinal primary-care database covering 8% of Australian general practices. Main outcomesWe applied 2023 and 2012 risk algorithms to estimate and categorise individual-level CVD risk into low, intermediate, and high. Risk re-classification in accordance with the 2023 algorithm was not possible. Cohens kappa and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement and concordance. ResultsUsing the 2023 CVD risk algorithm and revised thresholds, 9.7% of participants were high ([&ge;]10% 5-year risk or clinically-determined high risk); 26.4% were intermediate (5-<10% 5-year risk), and 63.9% were low CVD risk (<5% 5-year risk). Corresponding 2012 figures were: 17.6% high (>15% 5-year risk or clinically-determined high risk); 11.6% intermediate (10-15% 5-year risk); and 70.8% low risk (<10% 5-year risk). Differences in proportions at high risk were largely driven by changes to clinically-determined high risk criteria. Overall, there was moderate-to-substantial agreement (kappa=0.62) and concordance (Kendalls tau-b=0.74) between the algorithms. ConclusionProportions estimated at low risk and not routinely recommended pharmacotherapy align with international standards and were similar between guidelines. Although fewer people would be recommended pharmacotherapy on the basis of high risk under the updated versus previous guidelines, this reflects better estimates of contemporary risk using the 2023 equation and does not account for re-classification. Pharmacotherapy is considered for those at intermediate risk depending on clinical context under the 2023 guidelines. To ensure continued reduction of the CVD burden across the population, we emphasise the application of re-classification factors and benefits of pharmacotherapy for those at intermediate risk. Summary boxO_ST_ABSThe knownC_ST_ABSAustralian CVD prevention guidelines were updated in 2023, replacing 2012 guidelines. They recommend preventive pharmacotherapy for people at high 5-year CVD risk ([&ge;]10%) and considering it for intermediate risk (5-<10%). The new9.7% of participants were classified as high, 26.4% as intermediate, and 63.9% as low CVD risk under the 2023 guidelines, using large-scale primary-care data. This compares with 17.6% high, 11.6% moderate and 70.8% low risk under 2012 guidelines. The implicationsUpdated CVD risk algorithms more accurately reflect contemporary risk. Pharmacotherapy should be discussed systematically with people at intermediate CVD risk under the 2023 guidelines.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.