Distribution of cardiovascular disease risk based on the updated 2023 guideline-recommended Australian cardiovascular disease risk algorithm and comparison with the 2012 algorithm
Lazarevic, N.; Bhat, M.; Joshy, G.; Butler, D.; Woodward, M.; Patel, A.; Jackson, R.; Jennings, G.; Wyber, R.; Paige, E.; Banks, E.
Show abstract
ObjectiveAustralian guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management, including risk prediction algorithms, were updated in 2023. We quantified CVD risk using the 2023 algorithm, compared this to the previous 2012 algorithm, and considered implications for preventive pharmacotherapy. DesignComparative analysis. Setting, participantsData from 115,873 people aged 45-74 years without existing CVD from MedicineInsight, a longitudinal primary-care database covering 8% of Australian general practices. Main outcomesWe applied 2023 and 2012 risk algorithms to estimate and categorise individual-level CVD risk into low, intermediate, and high. Risk re-classification in accordance with the 2023 algorithm was not possible. Cohens kappa and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement and concordance. ResultsUsing the 2023 CVD risk algorithm and revised thresholds, 9.7% of participants were high ([≥]10% 5-year risk or clinically-determined high risk); 26.4% were intermediate (5-<10% 5-year risk), and 63.9% were low CVD risk (<5% 5-year risk). Corresponding 2012 figures were: 17.6% high (>15% 5-year risk or clinically-determined high risk); 11.6% intermediate (10-15% 5-year risk); and 70.8% low risk (<10% 5-year risk). Differences in proportions at high risk were largely driven by changes to clinically-determined high risk criteria. Overall, there was moderate-to-substantial agreement (kappa=0.62) and concordance (Kendalls tau-b=0.74) between the algorithms. ConclusionProportions estimated at low risk and not routinely recommended pharmacotherapy align with international standards and were similar between guidelines. Although fewer people would be recommended pharmacotherapy on the basis of high risk under the updated versus previous guidelines, this reflects better estimates of contemporary risk using the 2023 equation and does not account for re-classification. Pharmacotherapy is considered for those at intermediate risk depending on clinical context under the 2023 guidelines. To ensure continued reduction of the CVD burden across the population, we emphasise the application of re-classification factors and benefits of pharmacotherapy for those at intermediate risk. Summary boxO_ST_ABSThe knownC_ST_ABSAustralian CVD prevention guidelines were updated in 2023, replacing 2012 guidelines. They recommend preventive pharmacotherapy for people at high 5-year CVD risk ([≥]10%) and considering it for intermediate risk (5-<10%). The new9.7% of participants were classified as high, 26.4% as intermediate, and 63.9% as low CVD risk under the 2023 guidelines, using large-scale primary-care data. This compares with 17.6% high, 11.6% moderate and 70.8% low risk under 2012 guidelines. The implicationsUpdated CVD risk algorithms more accurately reflect contemporary risk. Pharmacotherapy should be discussed systematically with people at intermediate CVD risk under the 2023 guidelines.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Vitamin B12 and Risk of Diabetes: New insight from Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT) 93%
- Predictors of Arterial Stiffness in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study 92%
- CREBRF missense variant rs373863828 has both direct and indirect effects on type 2 diabetes and fasting glucose in Polynesians living in Samoa and Aotearoa New Zealand 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 95%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 92%
- Harnessing the power of polygenic risk scores to predict type 2 diabetes and its subtypes in a high-risk population of British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in a routine healthcare setting 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Covid-19 fatality prediction in people with diabetes and prediabetes using a simple score at hospital admission 94%
- Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects Across Nine Glucose-Lowering Drug Classes in Type 2 Diabetes: Extension of the LEGEND-T2DM Network Study 93%
- Use of semaglutide and risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: A Danish-Norwegian cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiovascular risk prediction in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of 22 risk scores in primary care setting 96%
- Type 2 diabetes risks and determinants in 2nd generation migrants and mixed ethnicity people of South Asian and African Caribbean descent in the UK 93%
- Replication and cross-validation of T2D subtypes based on clinical variables: an IMI-RHAPSODY study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive value of circulating NMR metabolic biomarkers for type 2 diabetes risk in the UK Biobank study 93%
- Maternal smoking during pregnancy and type 1 diabetes in the offspring: A nationwide register-based study with family-based designs 92%
- Polygenic Risk Score Improves the Accuracy of a Clinical Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.