Early adolescent substance use patterns and associated factors: A longitudinal analysis of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study
Otero-Leon, D. F.; Harwood, M. I.; Jalali, M. S.; Dong, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundEarly substance use is associated with long-term negative health and behavioral outcomes. While extensive research has examined predictors of substance use in adolescents and adults, relatively little is known about the risk factors that drive substance use in younger children. Furthermore, most studies focus on individual substances in isolation, rather than exploring the use of multiple substances. This study aims to identify demographic, family, and peer-related factors associated with alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, and multiple substance use in children aged from 9 to 13. MethodsWe analyzed longitudinal data from 11,868 children enrolled in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (version 5.1), incorporating observations collected from baseline, annual follow-ups, and mid-year phone interviews. Substance use outcomes were categorized into five mutually exclusive groups: no use, alcohol only, nicotine only, cannabis only, and use of two or more substances. We applied a generalized estimating equation model to assess the associations between substance use outcomes and demographic, family, and peer characteristics. ResultsPeer substance use was consistently associated with all categories of child substance use, particularly for the use of two or more substances. Parental drug use, permissiveness toward alcohol, and lower parental education were also linked to increased risk. Older age was associated with alcohol, nicotine, and multiple substance use. ConclusionsFindings highlight the importance of peer and family environments in shaping early substance use behaviors. Early prevention efforts should consider these factors to effectively target at-risk children.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic Scores Predict the Development of Alcohol and Nicotine Use Problems from Adolescence through Young Adulthood 95%
- Alcohol use and cognitive functioning in young adults: improving causal inference 95%
- Age-based differences in quantity and frequency of consumption when screening for harmful alcohol use 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Agreement between DSM-IV and DSM-5 measures of substance use disorders in a sample of adult substance users 95%
- Associations between ZIP code-level alcohol outlet density and binge drinking among people who inject drugs in 22 US Metropolitan Areas 94%
- Changes in injecting versus smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine among people who inject drugs in San Diego, California, 2020 to 2023 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex and Gender Influences on Problematic Cannabis Use and Cannabis Use Disorder: A Scoping Review Protocol 96%
- Neighborhood level factors and use of cigarettes, cannabis and e-cigarettes: a population-based study among Canadian adults 95%
- Emotion regulation and cognitive function as mediating factors for the association between lifetime abuse and risky behaviors in women of color 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
- Specific diagnostic criteria identify those at high risk for progression from ‘preaddiction’ to severe alcohol use disorder 90%
- Neuroanatomical variability associated with early substance use initiation: Results from the ABCD Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social-spatial network structures among young urban and suburban persons who inject drugs in a large metropolitan area 91%
- Diagnosis and treatment of opioid-related disorders in a South African private sector medical insurance scheme: a cohort study 90%
- Changes in Characteristics of Opioid Overdose Death Trends during the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.