Back

Modeling the Impact of Social Determinants on Breast Cancer Screening: A Data-Driven Approach

Ma, G.; Scully, M. G.; Luo, J.; Marrero, W. J.; Feng, J. H.; Gunn, C. M.; diFlorio-Alexander, R. M.; Tosteson, A. N. A.; Kraft, S. A.

2025-06-24 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.06.24.25330138 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study addresses the critical implementation science challenge of operationalizing social determinants of health (SDoH) in clinical practice. We develop and validate models demonstrating how SDoH predicts mammogram screening behavior within a rural population. Our work provides healthcare systems with an evidence-based framework for translating SDoH data into effective interventions. MethodsWe model the relationship between SDoH and breast cancer screening adherence using data from over 63,000 patients with established primary care relationships within the Dartmouth Health System. Our analytical framework integrates multiple machine learning techniques including light gradient boosting machine, random forest, elastic-net logistic regression, Bayesian regression, and decision tree classifier with SDoH questionnaire responses, demographic information, geographic indicators, insurance status, and clinical measures to quantify and characterize the influence of SDoH on mammogram scheduling and attendance. ResultsOur models achieve moderate discriminative performance in predicting screening behaviors, with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 71% for scheduling and 70% for attendance in validation datasets. Key social factors influencing screening behaviors include geographic accessibility measured by the rural-urban commuting area, neighborhood socioeconomic status captured by the area deprivation index, and healthcare access factors related to clinical sites. Additional influential variables include months since the last mammogram, current age, and the Charlson comorbidity score, which intersect with social factors influencing healthcare utilization. By systematically modeling these SDoH and related factors, we identify opportunities for healthcare organizations to transform SDoH data into targeted, facility-level intervention strategies while adapting to payer incentives and addressing screening disparities. ConclusionsOur model provides healthcare systems with a data-driven approach to understanding and addressing how SDoH shape mammogram screening behaviors, particularly among rural populations. While initially focused on breast cancer screening, this systematic framework lays the groundwork for analyzing SDoHs influence on other preventive health behaviors, demonstrating the potential for broader applications in improving routine preventive care utilization.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.5%
3
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
6
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.1%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
14
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.8%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%