Back

Increased contact transmission of contemporary Human H5N1 compared to Bovine and Mountain Lion H5N1 in a hamster model

Mukesh, R.; Kaiser, F.; Schulz, J. E.; Gallogly, S.; Prado-Smith, J.; Wickenhagen, A.; Cordove, K.; Smith, B.; Clancy, C.; Shaia, C.; Saturday, G.; de Wit, E.; van Doremalen, N.; Yinda, C. K.; Munster, V.

2025-06-23 microbiology
10.1101/2025.06.23.661180 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ongoing outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) subtype H5N1 in the U.S. poses a significant public health threat. To date, 70 human cases have been confirmed in the United States, including two severe cases and one fatality. While suitable animal models are crucial for predicting the potential pandemic risk of newly emerging pathogens in humans, studies investigating contemporary HPAIV H5N1 transmission dynamics remain limited. Here, we investigated the pathogenicity and transmission efficiency of three recent clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 viruses isolated from a bovine, mountain lion, and a human case using Syrian hamsters. Intranasal inoculation with 104 TCID50 resulted in productive virus replication in the respiratory tract and shedding for all three isolates. Transmission studies showed limited efficiency via direct contact and airborne routes for all three isolates. Although overall transmission was inefficient, the human H5N1 isolate demonstrated relatively greater contact transmissibility than the bovine and mountain lion isolates. Taken together, our data demonstrate that the Syrian hamster model complements existing animal models for influenza A virus research and expands the resources available for investigating the pathogenicity, transmissibility, and efficacy of countermeasures against HPAIV H5N1. One sentence summaryHuman HPAIV H5N1 exhibits comparatively higher contact transmissibility than bovine and mountain lion isolates, despite limited overall transmission.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.