Back

User Experience and Therapeutic Alliance in AI-Driven Mental Health Interventions: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Shankar, R.; Devi, F.; Xu, Q.

2025-06-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.06.22.25330071 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly being integrated into mental health interventions, but their impact on user experience and the therapeutic alliance remains poorly understood. This protocol outlines a systematic review of methods and applications. ObjectiveTo synthesize qualitative evidence on how AI influences user experience and therapeutic alliance in mental health interventions. MethodsWe will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus from inception to June 2025. Qualitative studies exploring user experiences of AI-driven mental health interventions will be included. The ECLIPSE framework will guide the review process. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data, and assess methodological quality using the CASP Qualitative Checklist. Thematic synthesis will be used to analyze and integrate findings across studies. Confidence in the evidence will be assessed using GRADE-CERQual. DiscussionThis review will provide insights into the factors shaping user engagement and therapeutic alliance with AI-driven mental health interventions. Findings will inform the design and implementation of AI technologies that optimize user experience and clinical effectiveness. Strengths, limitations, and implications for research and practice will be discussed.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.