Implementing Inclusive Online Psychological Support after Stroke: Professional Stakeholder Views from a Qualitative Study
Ditta, J.; Longley, V.; Woodward-Nutt, K.; Chouliaria, N.; Thomas, S.; Cotterill, S.; Bamford, A.; Conroy, P.; Bowen, A.; Patchwood, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundEmotional difficulties post-stroke are common, particularly among people from minoritised ethnic communities or with aphasia, an acquired communication disorder. However, there is a shortage of supportive evidence-based interventions, and of clinical psychologists to deliver them at scale. Wellbeing After Stroke-2 (WAterS-2) is a novel, online, group psychotherapy intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. It was designed to support post-stroke psychological adjustment, delivered by a trained non-psychologist workforce to increase potential reach. To guide equitable implementation of such interventions into routine stroke care, this study explored barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of key stakeholders: healthcare commissioners, managers, and frontline clinicians. MethodsQualitative, semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted online with purposively recruited healthcare professionals involved in commissioning, managing, or delivering stroke care in England. The qualitative interview schedule was informed by both the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), while the subsequent thematic template analysis was primarily guided by CFIR to explore contextual factors and practical strategies for equitable implementation. ResultsFourteen interviews were conducted, with commissioning managers (n = 8), service managers (n = 4), and clinicians (n = 2). Analyses suggested three themes around the barriers and facilitators likely to influence equitable implementation: (1) Quality of Care vs. Quality of Cash Flow - highlighting a tension between tailoring for inclusion and demonstrating clinical- and cost-effectiveness; (2) Time & Leadership - highlighting a need for leadership to prioritise time investment in equity efforts; (3) Postcode Lottery - highlighting existing variation in local infrastructure, with third-sector partnerships suggested as key enablers. ConclusionEquitable implementation of online psychological support requires balancing the diverse needs of stroke survivors and the constraints of a publicly funded healthcare system. Recommended actions to enable equity provide useful insights for the development, implementation and commissioning of online mental health interventions for stroke survivors. Strategies such as embedding interventions within existing workflows, securing leadership support, and forming partnerships with community organisations may help translate online support like WAterS-2 into routine care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of Mobile Stroke Units in England and Wales: a mixed methods study 97%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal caregiving following stroke: a qualitative exploration of carer self-identification, care-related language and support experiences 96%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Can we enhance neurorehabilitation through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation? A mixed methods evaluation of NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL). 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 96%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 94%
- Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process Evaluation of APPLE-Tree (Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle bEhaviour Change and Technology to build REsiliEnce), a Dementia-Prevention Study focused on Health and Lifestyle changes 94%
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 94%
- Secondary Stressors And Their Psychosocial Impacts On Healthcare Staff: Lessons From A Qualitative Systematic Review From The COVID-19 Pandemic In The UK 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.