Educational attainment of children with major congenital anomalies during primary school in England: a population cohort study using linked administrative data from ECHILD
Tan, J.; Cant, A.; Lewis, K. M.; Nguyen, V.; Gimeno, L.; Zylbersztejn, A.; Hardelid, P.; Morris, J. K.; De Stavola, B. L.; Harron, K.; Gilbert, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundMajor congenital anomalies (CAs) occur in 2.3% of livebirths and are associated with lower educational attainment in affected children. Understanding how attainment changes throughout primary school would inform parents, schools and organisations and help plan support. ObjectivesWe compared school enrolment and attainment at ages 5, 7 and 11 in children with different CAs and their peers in England using linked administrative hospital and education data in the ECHILD database. MethodsWe included all singleton children born in NHS-funded hospitals from September 2003 to August 2008 who enrolled in state-funded schools at age 4-5. CAs were identified from hospital diagnoses, procedures or death records. We described school enrolment, school-readiness, the percentages of children who sat curriculum assessments and who achieved expected levels in English and Maths at three ages. We estimated risk ratios of children with CAs achieving expected levels compared with peers, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. ResultsOf 2,351,589 singleton children enrolled at age 5, 78,847 (3.5%) had CAs. At age 11, 88.7% of enrolled children with CAs sat assessments versus 97.2% of peers. Proportionally fewer children with CAs (45.7%) were school-ready at age 5 versus peers (57.0%). For English, 56.9%, 55.4% and 65.3% of children with CAs achieved expected levels at ages 5, 7 and 11 respectively, consistently 11%-12% fewer than peers; similar gaps persisted for Maths. Children with CAs were on average less likely than peers to achieve expected levels [adjusted risk ratio, aRR (95%CI): 0.86 (0.85,0.86)] but this varied substantially across CA subgroups [aRR (95%CI) range: 0.01 (0.01,0.02) to 1.04 (0.96,1.12)]. ConclusionThe attainment gap between children with CAs and peers remained unchanged across subjects and ages, with proportionally fewer sitting assessments at age 11. Better monitoring and support for these children from school entry could help optimise learning experiences and fulfil their academic potential. SYNOPSISO_ST_ABSStudy questionC_ST_ABSWhat are the patterns of educational attainment in children with major congenital anomalies (CAs) throughout primary school? What is already knownStudies of regional or registry-specific cohorts of children with CAs showed that proportionally fewer achieve expected attainment relative to peers at single stages of national assessments. There is limited evidence on childrens participation in assessments and how attainment gaps change throughout primary school at a population level. What the study addsLongitudinal analysis of whole-population cohorts from ages 4 to 11 found that attainment gaps between children with and without CAs remained largely constant across ages. Over half of children with CAs were assessed as not school-ready at age 5. Whilst almost all children with CAs remained enrolled in school at age 11, one in nine did not participate in assessments.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in neural tube defects in Scotland 2000-2021 prior to the introduction of mandatory folic acid fortification of non-wholemeal wheat flour: a population-based study 94%
- Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric health-care use and severe disease: a retrospective national cohort study 93%
- Deficits in hospital care among clinically vulnerable children aged 0 to 4 years during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of SARS-CoV-2 testing, PCR-confirmed infections and COVID-19--related hospital admissions in children and young people: birth cohort study 94%
- Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents born very preterm and its correlates: a cross-sectional study 92%
- A multi-centre service evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentation of newly diagnosed cancers and type 1 diabetes in children in the UK 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of clinically extremely vulnerable children and children living with clinically extremely vulnerable people in Wales: A data linkage study 93%
- Vulnerabilities in child wellbeing among primary school children: a cross-sectional study in Bradford, UK 92%
- Examining the intersection of child protection and public housing: development, health and justice outcomes using linked administrative data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of school closures on physical and mental health of children and young people: a systematic review 92%
- Clinical features and burden of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents: an exploratory EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER program 90%
- The lasting effects of the pandemic: A time series analysis of first-time speech delays in kids under 5 years of age 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inpatient Kangaroo Care Predicts Early Cognitive Development at 6 and 12 Months in Infants Born Very Preterm 92%
- From Hospital to Home: Continuity between Skin-to-Skin Care and Later Verbal Engagement in Infants Born Preterm 89%
- Implementation of a pediatric telemedicine and medication delivery service in a resource-limited setting: A pilot study for clinical safety and feasibility 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.