Back

Perceptions and Experiences of Women Using Fertility Tracking Apps: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Shankar, R.; Devi, F.; Xu, Q.

2025-06-20 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.06.20.25329976
Show abstract

BackgroundFertility tracking apps have gained widespread popularity as a convenient method for women to monitor their menstrual cycles and improve chances of conception. Despite their prevalence, there is limited research synthesizing womens lived experiences and perceptions regarding the use of these apps. Understanding womens perspectives is crucial to address concerns about accuracy, privacy, and emotional well-being impacts, and to ensure that fertility apps are meeting the needs of their users. ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to synthesize qualitative research on womens perceptions and experiences of using fertility tracking apps. The review will explore womens attitudes, motivations, perceived benefits, and challenges related to the use of these apps. Specifically, it will identify key themes related to how these apps influence womens emotional well-being, relationships, and decision-making processes, while identifying gaps in current literature to guide future research. Methods and AnalysisThis review will consider qualitative studies that include women of reproductive age who have used or are currently using fertility tracking apps. The systematic review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence using a meta-aggregative approach. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus, from each databases inception to January 2025. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts using Covidence, assess full texts against inclusion criteria, and extract qualitative data using standardized tools. Study quality will be critically appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data will be analyzed using thematic synthesis following a three-step meta-aggregative approach: extracting findings verbatim, grouping similar findings into categories, and synthesizing categories into overarching findings. The certainty of findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach. DiscussionThis systematic review will provide the first comprehensive synthesis of womens experiences with fertility tracking apps, generating actionable insights for app developers, healthcare providers, and researchers. The synthesized findings can inform the development and refinement of fertility tracking apps to better meet user needs and preferences. Healthcare providers may benefit from these insights to guide patient discussions about fertility tracking and provide more tailored support. The identification of literature gaps will help direct future research efforts toward more diverse and inclusive studies on fertility tracking apps, ultimately contributing to improved womens reproductive health and well-being. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42025645316

Matching journals

1
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 6%
4.0× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 41%
12.5%
3
Sexually Transmitted Infections
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 0.2%
108× avg
4
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
5
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
#1
114× avg
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 2%
9.3× avg
7
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 3%
7.5× avg
8
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 0.5%
27× avg
9
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.9%
23× avg
10
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 13%
2.3%
11
Human Reproduction
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
12
Preventive Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.1%
25× avg
13
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 78%
1.3%
14
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 18%
1.7× avg
15
European Journal of Human Genetics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 25 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
16
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
Fortune Journals · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
7.6× avg
17
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 22%
0.8%