Back

Perceptions and Experiences of Women Using Fertility Tracking Apps: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Shankar, R.; Devi, F.; Xu, Q.

2025-06-20 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.06.20.25329976 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFertility tracking apps have gained widespread popularity as a convenient method for women to monitor their menstrual cycles and improve chances of conception. Despite their prevalence, there is limited research synthesizing womens lived experiences and perceptions regarding the use of these apps. Understanding womens perspectives is crucial to address concerns about accuracy, privacy, and emotional well-being impacts, and to ensure that fertility apps are meeting the needs of their users. ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to synthesize qualitative research on womens perceptions and experiences of using fertility tracking apps. The review will explore womens attitudes, motivations, perceived benefits, and challenges related to the use of these apps. Specifically, it will identify key themes related to how these apps influence womens emotional well-being, relationships, and decision-making processes, while identifying gaps in current literature to guide future research. Methods and AnalysisThis review will consider qualitative studies that include women of reproductive age who have used or are currently using fertility tracking apps. The systematic review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence using a meta-aggregative approach. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus, from each databases inception to January 2025. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts using Covidence, assess full texts against inclusion criteria, and extract qualitative data using standardized tools. Study quality will be critically appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data will be analyzed using thematic synthesis following a three-step meta-aggregative approach: extracting findings verbatim, grouping similar findings into categories, and synthesizing categories into overarching findings. The certainty of findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach. DiscussionThis systematic review will provide the first comprehensive synthesis of womens experiences with fertility tracking apps, generating actionable insights for app developers, healthcare providers, and researchers. The synthesized findings can inform the development and refinement of fertility tracking apps to better meet user needs and preferences. Healthcare providers may benefit from these insights to guide patient discussions about fertility tracking and provide more tailored support. The identification of literature gaps will help direct future research efforts toward more diverse and inclusive studies on fertility tracking apps, ultimately contributing to improved womens reproductive health and well-being. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42025645316

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.1%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
5
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
10
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.8%
13
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Global Health Action
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%